Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Sirota: Business Aims to Relax Bans on Products Made with Child & Slave Labor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:11 PM
Original message
David Sirota: Business Aims to Relax Bans on Products Made with Child & Slave Labor
Tue Nov 10, 2009 at 09:41

We've seen corporations use "free trade" agreements to quietly camouflage their push for exploitable labor in broader arguments about globalization. What we haven't seen is corporate special interests openly push for U.S. regulators to openly allow companies to sell goods made with child and slave labor...until now.
Check out this report from Inside U.S. Trade (no link- subscription required) - it's straight from the I Shit You Not File:


Business groups are worried by the potential effects of provisions banning the import of all goods made with convict labor, forced labor, or forced or indentured child labor that were included in a customs bill sponsored by Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and Ranking Member Charles Grassley (R-IA)...

These groups are examining the ramifications of the bill's provisions, especially in light of the bill's requirements that a newly created office in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) annually report to Congress on the volume and value of goods made with child labor, forced labor or convict labor that have been stopped at the border.

Business sources say this reporting requirement could cause DHS to more actively seek out imported products made with child labor, forced labor or convict labor...

One source did expect a push from lobbyists closer to the Finance Committee markup of the bill, and speculated that U.S. industry groups and foreign governments could form ad hoc coalitions to help send a united message.

Those of us pushing for serious trade policy reform have argued for years that businesses are aiming to create global economic policies that allow them to troll the world for the most exploitable forms of labor. As General Electric CEO Jack Welch famously said, corporations want laws that allow them to "have every plant you own on a barge" - one that can move from country to country looking for the worst conditions to exploit. Such an international economic regime would (and now does) allow the world's worst governments to create artificial comparative economic advantages through bad/immoral policies.

This is an important concept: Whereas comparative advantage used to be about natural advantages (ie. one country has optimal soil for grapes, another country has optimal soil for corn), "free trade" encourages countries to create comparative advantage through man-made laws. Some countries, for instance, creates a comparative advantage by letting factories pollute as much as they want, thus encouraging companies to move their factories there from other countries where pollution controls are more serious. Other countries create a comparative advantage by permitting children to be enslaved, thus encouraging companies operating in countries with more expensive non-slave labor to shift operations to a place where they can make products with all but free labor.

The way to stop this is for the world's largest economies to establish basic rules which everyone else will inevitably follow as a price of admission to those economies' markets. If the United States says companies cannot sell products in our market made with child slave labor, most companies will cease making products with child slave labor fearing the loss of access to our market which would destroy their business.

Of course, that's why business has opposed every effort to put basic labor, environmental and human rights standards into our international trade agreements - and why business groups are now preparing to try to weaken the laws barring products made with child slave labor. They know that the less rules that exist in the American market, the more cost-cutting exploitation they can engage in.

That corporations' advocacy for deregulation has now become so brazen that they are effectively pushing the U.S. government to endorse child slave labor is predictable. This is what their globalization agenda has always been all about. The only thing surprising about it is that in a Washington so overtly dominated by Big Money, it has taken them this long to be this blatant about their objectives.

http://www.openleft.com/diary/15912/business-aims-to-relax-bans-on-products-made-with-child-and-slave-labor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I guess it really is "free" trade because it means corporations are free
to screw each and every one of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's what it always comes down to
Everyone on both sides yells, "Freedom!"

It's just a matter of whose freedom they're talking about.

The rich guys on the right think they should have all the freedom (along with all the money) and everyone else should have none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Freedom of the most ruthless
Take away the rules, let sheer power have the final say, and everything devolves into a bloody brawl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, it's called offshoring jobs!
Free trade, for Americans at least, means "Welcome to Serfdom - Mission Accomplished".

It is amusing to note that just a few short decades ago any member of Congress would have openly supported and enabled communist regimes would have been savagely attacked and sent packing by their peers and the media. In America of 2009, members of Congress can't get in line fast enough to do business with these same regimes. Today, politicans in Washington hardly blink an eye when GM wants to sell the company that makes the Hummer passenger vehicle to the godless, Communist Chinese. It all goes to show that Orwell was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is why Obama's campaign promise to revisit and revise Free Trade
agreements to add more protections was so damned important.

And this is why it is so incredibly disappointing that Obama has dropped that promise entirely and now is pushing more free trade agreements just like the existing ones.

:(

If they remove the existing protections, as few and as weak as they are, do we really want to be a nation that encourages and allows slavery again?

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Human nature hasn't changed
since the beginning of time. we had slaves 6,000 years ago and we have no problem having slaves today. I mean the "owners" have no problem with slaves or child labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC