House: Yes to Extreme Anti-Choice Politics, No to Women’s Health and Privacy

[IndianaGreen]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 7, 2009

House: Yes to Extreme Anti-Choice Politics, No to Women’s Health and Privacy
NARAL Pro-Choice America says fight is not over

Washington, D.C. – Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, called House passage of a stunning last-minute anti-choice amendment to health reform an outrageous blow to women's freedom and privacy — and she vowed to fight to remove this provision as the process goes to the Senate.

The amendment, offered by anti-choice Reps. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) and Joe Pitts (R-Penn.), was adopted late tonight by a margin of 240-194.

The Stupak-Pitts amendment makes it virtually impossible for private insurance companies that participate in the new system to offer abortion coverage to women. This would have the effect of denying women the right to use their own personal private funds to purchase an insurance plan with abortion coverage in the new health system — a radical departure from the status quo. Presently, more than 85 percent of private-insurance plans cover abortion services.

"This vote is a reminder to America's pro-choice majority that, despite our gains in the last two election cycles, anti-choice members of Congress still outnumber our pro-choice allies," Keenan said. "It is unconscionable that anti-choice lawmakers would use health reform to attack women's health and privacy, but that's exactly what happened on the House floor tonight. Even though the bill already included a ban on federal funding for abortion and a requirement that only women's personal funds could pay for abortion care, Reps. Stupak and Pitts took their obsession with attacking a woman's right to choose to a whole new level. We will hold those lawmakers who sided with the extreme Stupak-Pitts amendment accountable for abandoning women and capitulating to the most extreme fringe of the anti-choice movement. In short, the fight is not over. That's why we will continue to mobilize our activists and work with our allies in Congress to remove this dangerous provision from the health-care bill and stop additional attacks as the process moves to the Senate."

http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/news/press-releases/2009/pr11072009_househcrbillstupak.html

[mullard12ax7]

1. 1 measly rec and no comments on equal rights

Says a lot about how brainwashed and propaganda-fed the American people have become.

[Demeter]

2. I'm Thinking We Have to Simply Vote All the Men Out

Sorry guys, we've been patient, but this is the point of no quarter given.

[h9socialist]

3. Brilliant!

Brilliant! Replacing John Conyers and Barney Frank with Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin -- now there's an avenue for women's empowerment!!!! Great thinking!

However, I hate the Stupak-Pitts amendment too! What happened in the House is water under the bridge. The trick is to get health reform without the bloody sexist and neanderthal anti-choice language. That's where the fight is, it's still a winnable fight . . . and there are progressive males who are more than willing to help accomplish that. Don't poke your friends in the eye with a stick.

Talk some sense!

[Demeter]

4. You Have Obviously NO Experience With All-Women Groups

There's a reason why those you name are loners.

[h9socialist]

5. Huh?

Could you please express yourself more clearly, rather than all these loose end one-liners?