Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Immigrants in the American heartland

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 10:33 AM
Original message
Immigrants in the American heartland
Source: BBC

As small farmsteads gave way to large scale agribusiness and unions lost their grip on the region's meatpacking plants, sending wages plummeting, the white population began to leave. At the High School, once overwhelmingly white, Hispanic students now predominate. Native Iowans are a dwindling minority. The numbers reflect a community where the local economy holds fewer attractions for middle-class Americans and where immigrants are drawn in to fill the gaps.

Such scenes might be commonplace elsewhere in this country of immigrants, but 20 years ago they were unthinkable here in the Midwest, where diversity used to be a question of whether your 19th Century antecedents were German or Scandinavian. Demographic maps of America show a great hollowing out of the middle, across the Great Plains and the Midwest. In some areas, almost every county has experienced significant net emigration during the past 20 years.

Mark Grey, a professor of anthropology at the University of Northern Iowa, says three kinds of community remain:
• larger urban areas, connected to the global economy
• rural counties that are slowly dying, with shrinking and ageing populations, and
• places like Storm Lake that are bucking the trend of rural depopulation, thanks entirely to immigration

After a kosher meat processing plant opened here in 1987, Postville underwent sudden and dramatic change. For more than 15 years, the town celebrated its newfound diversity. It held an annual Taste of Postville food festival, and its school kept track of the languages that came and went over time - 37 at the last count. But in May last year, it all came crashing down as heavily-armed federal agents swooped on the town and arrested almost 400 illegal immigrants working at the kosher plant.

Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8339249.stm



Most rural counties have been losing population for decades, not just the last 20 years, unless they are close enough to a metropolitan area to be considered a distant suburb. First farms got more mechanized then agribusiness took over and many young people have found the allure of city life preferable to staying in their small home town or on the farm.

The way the BBC tells it whites started to leave the meatpacking plants after wages fell as unions were broken. Then immigrants were "drawn in to fill the gaps". The cause/effect/timing of the whites leaving and the immigrants arriving is probably more muddled than that, enough so that it is easy to make "history" fit what you believe "must" have been how it happened.

It is possible that as the meatpacking unions were broken and wages fell whites joined the general exodus from rural areas and immigrants ("from Mexico, Guatemala, Ukraine, Israel and Somalia) arrived and took advantage of the situation. It is also possible that immigrants were used to help break the unions (even if the BBC didn't describe it that way) and stayed after the whites left both the plant and, often, the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've been watching this happen in Nebraska, too--
where I'm at, it's still mostly German, Scandinavian and Czech ancestry, but in some towns further west from me, the Mexican population is starting to overtake the white population--mostly due to meat processing plants and feed lots. Not sure what long-term impact this will have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Long Term Impact?
Prettier girls, better food, more landscaping with roses, adobe style architecture, more catholic churches and at least a minor rise in pinata sales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. No one will ever accuse you of not looking on the bright side. Except for the churches, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. At the very least.
many of the churches are pretty to look at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Prettier girls?
I'd argue that point. Love the blondes with the blue eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well, sir!
I'm not sayng that white girls aren't pretty! It's all simply a matter of taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Why am I hearing Festus Haggen when you post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Good Morning Mr Dillon!
Perception is everything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Well, all else aside, the food would definitely be an improvement--
I hate the food here--both home cooking and non-chain-restaurant food. It's godawful and bland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mule_train Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. 'Prettier girls;? that's kinda racist, isnt it? nt
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 12:19 PM by mule_train
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Whoa there muletrain!
You mean I can't prefer dark skinned beauties? I will say that I have nothing against white people...some of my best friends are white.

I knew that comment would spark a reply. Of course I think white people should have equal rights and should be able to marry and live with whomever and wherever they want. I think white people should be allowed to go to schools of their choice too! Does that make me a racist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mule_train Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. if someone said the reverse it would be called racist nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. I would not think so
I think people see beauty where they will. Has nothing to do with race necessarily. I just like brunettes with dark skin. It's more about my aesthetics than race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. You knew it was a racist comment, which is why I ignored it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. Yeah, the new neighbors are the cool part of this!
In NH, we get Somalis and Balkan refugees, with Carribean immigrants. They join the Greeks, the Acadians,Poles/Russians, and all the rest. Nice folks, and the food just gets better and better. Part of the ready acceptance of many here is Yankee frugality and work ethic - I've worked with a bunch of these folks, and they largely work hard and take their jobs seriously - and manufacturing needed a little brightening up and diversity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. And where do we have to get this news? From the BBC. For christ............
............sake, all we get from our "liberal" media is missing white women and reality TV. You know I just recently found out that CNN has a CNNI and the "regular" American propaganda CNN. We are getting fed propaganda every fucking day by our "liberal" media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. What's the news? Mexicans invading Iowa? I was more surprised at the Lubavichers being there.
I don't normally think of Lubavicher Jews and Iowa in the same thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. The 2010 census should be interesting
Storm Lake was 80% nonhispanic white in the 2000 census, so if you count the hispanic whites then it was over 80% white. When you mix "hispanic" by which I assume they mean Latino with "white" by which I assume they mean caucasians not dark enough to visually identified as "hispanic" you get white. In other words, we're going to need some new words and I'm betting that the US 2010 census doesn't have any new words, it will be pretty much as useless as the 2000 census is where you have them counting "whites" by some unknown definition other than primary race, "hispanics" regardless of race and thus artificially inflating or deflating other racial categories, and my all time favorite "Asians" which is utterly meaningless, as Asia has every major race and dozens of subraces indigenous to the continent.

It will also be interesting to see if the "common knowledge" of "shrinking rural towns/counties" is actually true common knowledge. In many places that have been accused of this happening, the locals are quick to point out that the population has done nothing but increase since a slight or major dip in the 1970's, which generated the belief that this is widespread and ongoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You could have a new box.
Have a "person of deep browness" box to check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. It's beyond ridiculous that "hispanic" is the only "white" ethnicity the Census bureau cares about..
No "Nordic", "Gaelic", "Slavic", or "Arab" check boxes. Just "white (non hispanic)" or "hispanic". :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. government gobbletygook with a design
The design is to lie. The gobbletygook is to confuse.

When you look at the Census short report, it lists "white nonhispanic" and "black (presumably nonhispanic)" and "Hispanic" which it points out "Hispanic can be of any race and figures for Hispanic population should not be added to other race statistics" or something like that. So are the Latino's counted or not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. It boggles the mind as to what they imagine the basis for these categories is...
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 11:36 AM by Romulox
It's not science (it's not even social science!); it's not how people classify themselves...so where in Ann's Green Gables did our government come up with these categories?

It's odd...living in Dearborn, Michigan, I've known many middle easterners. Some are very emphatic in identifying themselves as "white", while others have really bristled at labeling themselves as "white (non-hispanic)", which is how the government has classified them.

Just an observation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. identifiers
I think they do that because some hispanics identify themselves as white, and some (primarily from Cuba, Venezuela, Colombia, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic and Brazil) identify more as African American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. OK. But what about how everybody else identifies themselves?
Any specific reason why that information isn't considered especially important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. The Census ought to be very precise. Are Filipinos Hispanic? Remember "Spanish surnamed American"?
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 12:52 PM by imdjh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yep, they "took advantage" of those low wages and lousy working conditions
Because, you know, "those people" are different. They have a "superior work ethic" and they just looooooove to do horrid shitty "jobs that Americans won't do".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. "wages fell as unions were broken"
Farmers have to deal through monopolies like ADM and Heartland - yet somehow these stories always come across as trying to say it's the Latin American economic refugees' fault that corporations and their stockholders are greedy. OMG other has invaded Iowa. Actually drawing people into urban areas, then focusing on making those urban centers sustainable, and more family and lifestyle-friendly, would be great for the environment (leaving the farmers and ranchers well spaced out in the rural parts). Exurbs, and sprawling suburbs are a waste of space and devastating to habitats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
41. Well said
The big boys in agriculture have played rough for a long time, and they don't get called on it often enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. Is the OP against workplace enforcement of immigration, child labor, OSHA, FLSA?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder if they got the time line right
wages began to drop so illegals moved in.

Sure it's isn't the other way around?

About like saying wages are on the rise, allowing unions to form and function effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mule_train Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Immigration policy is about busting working and middle class wages - period nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Seems to be working
too bad no major party or politician wants to address the issue.

Republicans want the workers, democrats want the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mule_train Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Obama's 'New Deal' for middle/working class vs bankers
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 11:57 AM by mule_train
for bankers: no matter how bad you f--k up, no matter how much value you DESTROY, (even to the point of sinking the whole country) the working classes have to bail you out, and your pay must INCREASE as long as there's someone out there on wall street who makes more than you

for workers: no matter how much value you produce, no matter how much you improve, your wages must DECREASE as long as there's someone out there in the 3rd world who makes less

this is fact, it's reality and it's time the working people called him out on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I hope the President pulls a rabbit out of his hat.
But right now, he sure appears to be a supply side corporatist surrounded by bankers and elite effete snobs.

We have been found to be expendable. The rich do not need us to accumulate wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mule_train Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I was thinking something else out of somewhere else
if you get my meaning

but all kidding aside, i think he knows exactly what he's doing

and that's the problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. I worked in meatpacking in the 1970s.
It was a unionized industry until about the middle of the decade, when the packing houses made a concerted and successful effort to bust the unions. The scabs back then were mainly, if not entirely, white and native born.

Now the packing houses are non-union and employ lots of foreign labor at low wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. here's the 2010 questionnaire.
http://2010.census.gov/2010census/how/interactive-form.php

see number 9. i think many of those immigrants will be avoiding the census takers. regardless, if white americans are fleeing the states and immigrants don't make up for that loss, middle america may lose some representatives.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Thank you. "Asian Indian" , now that is handy. Damn, the census did something right.
I like that they have broken out the Asian nations/subraces, I just wish they had done it for caucasians and negroes, maybe even American Indians. It would be cool to have a picture of how Americans identify. For instance, does Whoopi Goldberg self-ID as generic black or would she ID as "negro West African"? I would ID as Breton, Celt, or Anglo if given the option. Though, I have promised that I will ID as Melungeon in the 2010 census.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. LOL. Now there are 10 variants of "Asian", but apparently nobody else has an ethnicity
that is of any importance.

Where is the box for Dutch? Libyan? French? German?

Apparently the only ethnicities that currently matter are the Asian ones. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. The Germans and Scandinavians were immigrants too once

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I would love to see a homesteading and kibbutzim movement.
I think America would improve tremendously if there were a back to the land movement, and not the ersatz version we have seen in the mercantile "back to the small town" movement. I'm not talking about New Yorkers opening bead shops and coffee bars in Vermont, I mean people who actually MAKE/GROW something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC