Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Beck's Hotline to Nowhere

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 02:47 PM
Original message
Glenn Beck's Hotline to Nowhere
NOVEMBER 4, 2009

Glenn Beck's Hotline to Nowhere

By THOMAS FRANK
WSJ


Glenn Beck, the popular Fox News host, has a red telephone on his desk that never seems to ring. Every now and then, in a moment of acute frustration, he will pick it up and give the camera his trademark pleading-puppy look. What Mr. Beck wants to hear from the phone are answers, and he wants to hear them from the highest authority in the land: the phone, he says, is "a dedicated line right to the White House." And when Mr. Beck gets things wrong, he wants his antagonists on Pennsylvania Avenue to correct him. But "They don't call. They're not going to call."

One of the specific answers Mr. Beck wanted, on one of the days I watched his program last week, had to do with White House Communications Director Anita Dunn, who has been caught on film quoting one of those Mao Zedong aphorisms that wouldn't look out of place on a motivational poster. She also remarked that Mao was one of her "favorite political philosophers," an honor the Chinese Communist shared with Mother Teresa. Obviously Ms. Dunn was yet another person who deserved to be added to the long list of radicals that Mr. Beck had uncovered within the government.

(snip)

Yet there the mute telephone sits, a quiet symbol of Middle America's frustration. The diabolical liberals in the White House refuse even to acknowledge our queries. "Their silence is their answer," the host sighs. Is it really? On Monday I wrote to an old friend, Robert McChesney, a professor of communications at the University of Illinois who has been a frequent target of Mr. Beck in recent weeks for his left-wing views and also for co-founding Free Press, an advocacy group on media policy. Did Mr. McChesney get a chance to respond on the red phone or any other way? No. "He never asked me or Free Press to call the red phone," Mr. McChesney wrote me.

Then I emailed Mark Lloyd, the Chief Diversity Officer at the Federal Communications Commission. Mr. Beck has attacked Mr. Lloyd numerous times in recent weeks, repeatedly airing video clips in which he appears to hold noxious views. Did Mr. Lloyd get a chance to call the red phone? "No, no one gave me a phone number to call Beck." Nor should Mr. Beck require a phone call from the White House to understand that lots of people, including conservatives, have cited Mao and Lenin and other such demonic figures in all sorts of contexts, and that they aren't always careful, when so citing, to point out what bad people these were.



(snip)

What Mr. Beck's silent phone really symbolizes is a new kind of ignorance, a coming high-tech dark age in which people can choose to blow off professional standards of inquiry; in which they can wall themselves off with cable TV and friendly Web sites, dismiss what displeases as liberal bias, and demand that any contrary view be transmitted to them via telephone call from the president himself. Why not let Mr. Beck and his viewers have their fun? Because ideas have consequences. Maybe, as many believe, Glenn Beck is indeed the future of the conservative movement. From tea parties to town-hall meetings, thousands are signing up and fitting themselves out with their very own hotline to nowhere.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703740004574513721398614840.html

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A23

======

Can't someone hack his phone and pretend to be Jesus, or something?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Becks's silent red telephone
means that he is NOT the center of anyone's universe, an irony that he is incapable of appreciating.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I believe the mao remark was a joke by her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is up with Rupert Murdoch's WSJ attacking Rupert Murdoch's Fox News lately?
Seem like there was a similar editorial a few days ago that called out Fox for being totally ideological.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think that among the WSJ subscribers, the real rabids
are in the minority. I even remember, when it was announced that he was taking over, most of the online comments were very negative, afraid that it would become Foxified. I was also surprised how negative the reactions were for one of Bush State of the Union address, from 2005 or 2006, not sure, bashing his horrible presentation, with nucular and other "Bushism."

For example, see their recent editorial about the elections in upstate New York

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x490483

So what Murdoch needs is too keep the subscribers. This, at a time, when practically all the print newspapers are losing subscribers. Also, to stay relevant. And in order to stay relevant he can stay conservative, but not rabid.

So Frank Thomas has a column every two weeks and the same, I think, is also for Karl Rove.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Murdoch is trying to set up a psychological box for the conservatives to live in.
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 04:18 PM by Uncle Joe
It makes no difference whether they believe Rupert tastes great or is less filling, ultimately they're still drinking Murdoch's message while advancing his corporate supremacist agenda; over that of the American People in spite of his pseudo populist Beck puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC