Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Collins: Corporate Tantrums - Can We Trust These Companies With Our Health?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:29 PM
Original message
Michael Collins: Corporate Tantrums - Can We Trust These Companies With Our Health?
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 05:52 PM by babylonsister
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/45013

Corporate Tantrums - Can We Trust These Companies With Our Health?
Submitted by Chip on Wed, 2009-08-05 20:36.


Corporate Tantrums - Can We Trust these Companies with Our Health?
By Michael Collins | Michael Collins' Blog


...we're expected to believe that making the world safe for AETNA is so important to Jane and John Q Citizen, they'll trash town hall meetings to serve the cause.

Some major health insurers and other health interests are behind some of the highly emotional and disruptive scenes at town hall meetings around the country.

What does this say about their level of desperation concerning the health care debate?

Anyone who has raised a high spirited teen knows that when the facts are obvious about some misbehavior, there's always the chance that the facts will recede into a background of a highly emotional argument. Raise your voice after you see easy $3,000 damage to the car and you might hear, "Why are you yelling at me!" and so forth. Once the discussion heads in that direction, you've lost, at least for the moment.

The health care industry and their Republican allies are very much like a guilty teen -- screaming and yelling at town hall meetings to divert attention from the real issues surrounding health care for 300 million citizens. The only difference is that the corporate entities involved are using proxies like Freedomworks; a well funded public relations firm that offers just-in-time delivery of worked up "activist" groups. Its leadership and "hundreds of thousands of grassroots volunteers nationwide" think that screaming and yelling at town hall meetings to save the current health care system is persuasive public discourse.

This strategy surprised many as it unfolded during the first few congressional town halls. The debate over the need for health care reform has been momentarily diverted to a sideshow of indignant attendees shouting down their representative or senator. Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius felt the heat in Philadelphia. Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) was another recipient of health insurance industry enabled histrionics at his town hall meeting in liberal Austin, Texas. Rep. Frank Kratovil (D-MD) was hung in effigy in front of his Salisbury office in broad daylight just days ago, a distasteful reminder for locals of a very real lynching in 1913 when authorities did nothing.

Unfortunately for the corporate health care alliance, the play book was revealed just as the disruption plan got underway. A leaked memo from Freedomworks outlined the plan to systematically disrupt town hall meetings. The well funded organization is headed up by former Rep. Dick Armey (D-TX), a Newt Gingrich protégé.

Freedomworks is not alone in the battle to save the health insurance corporations. The powerful public relations firm representing AETNA and CIGNA, Shirley & Bannister Public Affairs, is closely tied to ResistNet.com and other "grassroots" disruptors. The Coalition to Protect Patients Rights is managed by a major lobbying group headed up by a former aid to Sen. Charles Grassley, (R-IA). Richard L. Scott, the former CEO of Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) started Conservatives for Patient Rights. Scott "sought opportunities elsewhere" after HCA was slapped with a $1.7 billion settlement for insurance fraud during his tenure.

Before the leaked memo on disruption tactics, Republicans crowed about the public displays showing "grassroots" opposition to health care reform. After the leak, it was apparent that the Republican office holders and Fox News had been mouthing the talking points outlined by the corporate grassroots organizers.

But as the facts emerged and the pattern was clear. The game plan is now on display. It's not magic if you know how the trick is done.

There may well be some people who are so attached to the health care status quo that they're irate (particularly if they're health insurance company retirees). However, the other concerns that would produce equal or greater outrage are not generating this type of protest. For example, anger at the failure to cap credit card interest rates, desperation about the high level of foreclosures, and lost pensions might be expected to generate some shout outs. That has not occurred. But we're expected to believe that making the world safe for AETNA is so important to Jane and John Q Citizen, they'll trash town hall meetings to serve the cause.

A New Level of Desperation for Corporate Health Insurers


The pictures above are all violent, hostile representations of moderate Democrats about to meet with the public. The tar and feathering had to do with Rep. Boyd's support for cap-and-trade energy legislation (another pet project of Freedomworks). Are the horned and hung representations of Doggett and Kratovil before public meetings in their districts somehow supposed to contribute to the health care debate?

The debased and trivial dialog on health care is a direct product of some major health insurers and other health interests employing those who specialize in debased and trivial dialog - the lobbying firms mentioned.

Do the leaders of these corporations actually think that they can sway public opinion with behavior that most find offensive? Have they completely given up on negotiating a piece of the health care market from the Obama administration? Have they reached a level of incompetence where their corporate governance starts to look like depraved indifference?

The tactics of disrupting town hall meetings is very strange and extremely risky. This is about all the companies have left, other than the normal legalized bribery through campaign donations. It's all the more surprising that they're calling on lobbying groups that came up with the failed Tea Bagging events. Why would this effort be any more effective or end any differently?

What industry leaders know but won't admit is this -- they've already lost the battle. A credible argument for single payer health is being made. Within the coalition supporting expanded health care, the clearest message comes from the single payer, nationalized health care faction. While it has been a struggle to put single payer and universal health care on the table, the idea has broad public support. Private health insurance may not go away this year but it's on the way out. The "industry" will be finished in the near to mid term.

What is the response from the insurance industry? Denigrate the dialog. Disrupt meetings with consistently rude behavior. Massively misrepresent the facts and analysis on the overall program of universal health care. Most stunning, the out of control disruptors present violent images aimed at the representatives they're trying to persuade. It's a pathetic display of the very worst leadership imaginable. As a result, it justifies the very worst interpretations of the motives and actions of these companies.

Who would trust these health insurance companies with their medical care and that of their families?

###

This article may be reproduced in whole or part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msedano Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. mental health covered in policies?
these screaming paid protestors are in for the shock of their lives when they seek future care for mental health issues of any kind. if these screamers adn pouters elect the private option, it's likely their insurance providers will disqualify them on the basis of pre-existing condition, proved by their wild displays in public back in 2009 during the health care colloquy.

it's a cosmic punch line. wait for it...

recommended.

mvs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasearchers Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. scum all of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. corporations are comic book evil,funy if it wasn't so sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. They've gone over the top
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 04:43 PM by autorank
These "grassroots" firms have been around for a long time. I first encountered one way back in the 80's when
a former Nader Raider recruited a bunch of seniors to form a coalition for, get this, charging a network
connection fee for everyone who used their phone lines to get to the internet. It was to be $3.00 a month.
This was the mid '80's. I was in the internet biz then and ended up speaking in opposition to this at
a big meeting. Guess what I found out - the seniors coalition was created by a "grassroots" firm to make
the case for the local phone companies.

Today, we have fake "grassroots" uprisings on health care, energy, you name it sponsored by the corporate
interests involved. It is deliberate deception. There ought to be a law but there isn't. The publicity
from this is helpful since it has come right at the start. I suppose that's better than nothing but it's
not enough.

The "grassroots" groups sponsored by the PR/lobbying firms also rif on subjects like the Kenyan plot to
overtake the US and the birth certificate issue. Even when the PR firms are tied to the groups on specific
issues, like health care, they can say, 'Oh, we had nothing to do with those charges about Obama, that's the
group acting on its own.' Sure it is, with corporate support. It's disgusting. More sunshine and lets
have one of the big outlets like McClatchy pick this up. It's time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. OMG
That's the most evastating a comment I've read in a few years. Preexisting cosmic justice, on the way.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. He forgot to switch the "R" after Arlen Specter's name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks, nice catch. I changed it-I hope he doesn't mind. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Correct me any time - both are changed in the original
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I confess - it's habitual - or maybe a subconscious comment;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for posting. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sketchy Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dick Armey is definitely not a D!
Excellent article, but you simply must change Armey's affiliation to R-TX, okay? That stands out like a sore thumb to me! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Too late, so I'll just highlight your post and spank autorank when
I see him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. He did spell "desperation" right,
which impresses me. My mental spellcheck is to think of the song "Desperado".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's a big K&R.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I'm moving up
Respectable people are posting my articles;)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Why do you hate the free market when We the People come shopping?
Do we stink up the joint, coming in without a corporate charter?

Corporate geniuses aren't afraid of stupid public programs. Private sector rocks! Government can't do diddly squat! Our elected officials have told us so!

Time, also, to abolish socialized roads, sewers, electricity, police, fire, food safety, and...damn! The socialism is just tiring me out!

How I long for the days when me and my brother rode our bikes behind the mosquito truck, breathing in their pro-life-intentioned fumes, not doubting whose life was best represented in the balance sheets of the day.


Good times; good times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Excellent summary & argument
I really like "socialized roads" - damn it! Let the market take care of it. I go on a free market road every
now and then. It's a financial disaster, flat broke. An experiment, it was resolved by --- state subsidies so
the folks on the highway would get to work. But seriously;), don't you think that we could all do a lot better
if all fire departments were volunteer departments in stead of "socialized?;) Gotta happen.

There's a huge mark up with the insurance company pays directly. Although if you buy insurance directly from
the source, you get a broader range of choices because - you can SUE your insurance company. None of this, "Oh
that operation to save your life is experimental" crap. They pay for what is "medically necessary."

But for those getting corporate insurance, the company pays the bills and the insurance carrier administers the plan.
When you're denied, two things could be happening. First, the administrator, e.g., AETNA, may be pushing back
on large claims to fulfill the promise when XYZ Inc. awarded the contract - keeping costs low. Second, the plan
may be written in such a way - BY THE COMPANY - to deny claims for "experimental" procedures (those accepted but
not fully codified as standard). Guess what? There's a federal law that indemnifies the company from any suit
and there's the insurance company that turns around and says, 'This is the plan we're administering, talk to your
company. They set the standards.' Sweet deal ... for them.

As an example, a patient in California needed a liver transplant. There was no doubt as to the medical necessity.
The plan administrator said no but the patient's family got on TV and made their case. Then the plan administrator
said, 'We approve.' By that time, the patient had died. But the company and plan administrator were 'protected'
from any accountability in court.

When these faux demonstrators say, 'Leave our health plans alone,' they're speaking for the insurance industry
and also for the corporations who set things up so that no matter how bad their behavior is in terms of
meeting medical needs, they're never held accountable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Thnx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. What I REALLY DON'T GET is that
the insurance companies hire DEPARTMENTS to deny claims until they're FORCED (by a substantial outlay of nerves and/or $$$ by the "insured") to pay legitimate claims. HOW MANY AMIS HAVE NOT been subjected to the bean counters protecting insurance industry PROFIT$ and then RAIL against da gubmint interfering TO PROTECT THEM??? I LOVED the video of the Congresscritter who asked who had insurance and then HOW MANY had Medicare. Anyway nobody ever went broke underestimating the stupidity... It's just sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You're right
Those people at the meeting you're talking about, the video, were largely shills put there by the Dick Army
lobbying firm. They say - leave it alone - which means that insurance companies can do just what they do and
screw us without any control by outside forces.

They do it at the behest of employers who shove off the responsibility of their greed onto the insurance
companies. Large firms are 'self insured' - they pay the costs for medical procedures - and they put AETNA
in between as the bad guys to say NO to us.

Single payer is the only rational choice at this point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. K & R.
"Who would trust these health insurance companies with their medical care and that of their families?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC