Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Republicans call on Gorelick to testify

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:11 PM
Original message
Senate Republicans call on Gorelick to testify
Senate Republicans call on Gorelick to testify
Lawmakers cite commissioner's prior role
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/22/commission.senators/index.html
From Ed Henry
CNN Washington Bureau



WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Eleven Senate Republicans fired off a letter Thursday to the 9/11 commission demanding that Jamie Gorelick, a Democratic member of the panel, be forced to testify.


Earlier this week, Rep. Jack Kingston of Georgia, a member of the GOP House leadership, released a scathing statement about the Democratic members of the commission.

"The commission is a reunion of political has-beens who haven't had face time since Seinfeld was a weekly show," he said, suggesting they were more interested in pointing fingers than finding solutions.

He said they had turned the commission's work into a "get-even-for-Monica investigation," a reference to the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which led to President Clinton's impeachment.


The letter was also signed by Republican senators: Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Trent Lott of Mississippi, Conrad Burns of Montana; Bob Bennett of Utah; Pete Domenici of New Mexico; Don Nickles of Oklahoma; Ted Stevens of Alaska; Mitch McConnell of Kentucky; John Cornyn of Texas and Norm Coleman of Minnesota.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. You idiots do NOT want to do this...but go ahead.
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 01:15 PM by Richardo
She'll have you for breakfast and make you look even more stupid than you already do. :evilgrin:

Look at the roster of morans behind this thing. You don't have to look too closely and you'll see the strings leading back to Delay's office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dedhed Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Three words...
BRING IT ON!!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why don't these dumb asses ask Ashcroft why he isn't smart enough to work
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 01:23 PM by MSgt213
around a memo written by a deputy in a previous administration when he is the fucking AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJ BENDER Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3.  A Who's Who of Schmucks !
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 01:23 PM by AJ BENDER
Chambliss :puke:

Lott : :puke:

McConnell :puke: :puke: :puke:

Coleman :puke: :puke:

Burns : :puke:

Bennett :puke:


Can You Say....BUCKETS OF SCUM !


HEY ! WHAT HAPPENED TO MY PUKING SMILIES ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeinesRed Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hey! I think we were puking simultaneously...
Edited on Fri Apr-23-04 01:29 PM by LeinesRed
you could list a few more than I could...before I had to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. those are the senators i LOATHE the most
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeinesRed Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Only 11 wanted to sign?
wow, and quite the illustrious group. Chambliss, Coleman, Lott, I can't continue typing names because I have to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. He Involked Monica?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think the legal term would be "precedent"
"MonicaGate" opened a whole can of worms, but it's the Republicans who opened it, so they've no right to complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. She would eat them alive - BRING IT ON!
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myopic4141 Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-04 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. An explanation is needed.
I wish she would testify. In doing so, she could explain how the Clinton Administration was able to work around the more stringent wall to prevent the millennium terrorist attacks. Such testimony would make Shrubby's Administration look even more incompetent (as if that were possible). It would also contradict the arguments about needing the Patriot Act to overcome the barrier. If I remember an old adage correctly, "be careful what you ask for for you may get it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC