Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pinkerton :U.S. needs to drop go-it-alone policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:16 PM
Original message
Pinkerton :U.S. needs to drop go-it-alone policy
U.S. needs to drop go-it-alone policy
James P. Pinkerton

http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vppin063742771apr06,0,2985865.column?coll=ny-viewpoints-headlines


April 6, 2004


One who knows both wars well is Bill Cowan, who spent two decades in the Marines, including 3½ years in Vietnam at the peak of the fighting. He retired as a lieutenant colonel in 1985, bringing home three Purple Hearts and 14 personal commendations. He has worked in the counterterrorism field ever since; he is also a military analyst for the Fox News Channel (where I, too, am a contributor).

So what does he think about the situation in Iraq right now, as Americans confront insurgents all over the country? "The bad news offsets the good," he answers. Applying his warrior's wisdom, Cowan is particularly critical of Sunday's military operation in Baghdad, in which U.S. troops shut down the offices of radical Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. In the fighting, seven Americans were killed and another two dozen wounded.

"It was a big mistake to send Americans to directly confront the Iraqis. If you send Americans into situations like that, you will create more enemies than you destroy. You have to use Iraqis against Iraqis."

Some might protest that the United States was not successful in Vietnam, to which Cowan responds that the war was lost at the negotiating table, not on the battlefield. That's a debate that's raged for three decades now - but in the meantime, it's hard to argue that the current Iraq plan is working well.


Cowan knows combat and counter-insurgency, firsthand. So when he warns against the current tactics in Iraq, one might expect the war hawks to pay him heed. Unless, of course, he is correct in his assessment of the American civilian leadership in Baghdad, which seems determined to pretend that failure is success. That's what happened before, back in 'Nam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DEM FAN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's Up With Pinkerton. He Is A Repub Right. He Seems To Be On
Our Side Lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is no technical solution
There has been so much death and bad faith there is no fix, at least none short of something Alexander or Attila might use.

You can't do what we did and then expect a socially engineered outcome. We have no political constituency in Iraq. We only have enemies and sychophants. In that sense, it's worse than Vietnam. At least there we had the remnants of the old colonial regime the French left and the Catholics. That is what allowed the war there to be so prolonged. The deterioration in Iraq is accelerated because we have nothing to work with. We worked on the destruction of that society for over twelve years. We succeeded.

What he's suggesting didn't work in Vietnam. Marines and merceneraries don't do utopia.

The so called experts are all wrong on this. I've heard it all before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC