Currently, the lead story on HuffingtonPost's main page is entitled "Boss Battle." It links to an interesting, pot-stirring story by the HuffPo's own Arthur Delaney about Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele saying that he is the de facto leader of the Republican Party, not "entertainer" Rush Limbaugh. That's followed by Limbaugh's own words explicating that Steele is not, in fact, the party leader.
But with just a bit of thought, one can only come to the undeniable conclusion that the whole question of "who is the Republican Party leader, Steele or Limbaugh?" is a ridiculous one on its face. Let me rephrase this, relying only on descriptors instead of names, and you'll see what I mean.
Who is the de facto leader of the Republican Party -- a black man, or a fat, white, hypocritical liar with mountains upon mountains of cash and a penchant for hillbilly heroin? The answer's pretty obvious, no?
More here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-sweeney/rush-is-right_b_171183.html