It is frequently suggested that the Democratic Party, once fairly divided on the issue of trade policy, has moved in recent years toward the fair-trade camp. As such, while most Republicans continue to preach the free-trade orthodoxy of the 1990s with all the associated fantasia about a coming boom for U.S. manufacturers and farmers, relief of global poverty and the certain spread of democracy, Democrats are supposed to be the realists who recognize the failure of the North American Free Trade Agreement, granting permanent Most-Favored Nation status to China and other trade-related missteps of the Clinton years.
But for the critical position of Secretary of Commerce, which has a significant role in both the framing and advancement of trade policies, Obama has nominated former Washington Governor Gary Locke.
Obama says that Locke will be "a trusted voice in my Cabinet" on economic issues, while Locke says he'll make the Commerce Department -- which has traditionally been the corporate bastion in Democratic and Republican administrations -- an "active and integral partner" in shaping and promoting Obama's economic agenda.
Unfortunately, to the extent that Obama has expressed a desire to develop trade policies that are more responsive to Main Street than Wall Street, there is little reason to believe that the Commerce nominee is on board.
Locke has long been one of the Democratic Party's most ardent advocates for free trade agreements that get high marks from multinational corporations but are condemned by human rights groups and labor, farm and environmental organizations.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/state_of_change/411955/gary_locke_militant_and_misguided_free_traderThere are way too many pro-business people in the new WH cabinet.