Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Webb Sets His Sights On Prison Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 11:15 AM
Original message
Webb Sets His Sights On Prison Reform

Senator Proposes National Panel

By Sandhya Somashekhar
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 29, 2008; B01

Somewhere along the meandering career path that led James Webb to the U.S. Senate, he found himself in the frigid interior of a Japanese prison.

A journalist at the time, he was working on an article about Ed Arnett, an American who had spent two years in Fuchu Prison for possession of marijuana. In a January 1984 Parade magazine piece, Webb described the harsh conditions imposed on Arnett, who had frostbite and sometimes labored in solitary confinement making paper bags.

"But, surprisingly, Arnett, home in Omaha, Neb., says he prefers Japan's legal system to ours," Webb wrote. "Why? 'Because it's fair,' he said."

This spring, Webb (D-Va.) plans to introduce legislation on a long-standing passion of his: reforming the U.S. prison system. Jails teem with young black men who later struggle to rejoin society, he says. Drug addicts and the mentally ill take up cells that would be better used for violent criminals. And politicians have failed to address this costly problem for fear of being labeled "soft on crime."

Continued>>>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/28/AR2008122801728_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. k'd and r'd... and would do so a thousand times, if I could
there should be NO non-violent offenders sitting behind bars, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. absolutely - behind this 1000 percent
It needs to go even further - to judicial system reform.

my absolute top of the list pet peeve:

Reporters at conviction saying "the defendent showed no emotion", and the judge at sentencing saying "because the defendant showed no emotion the court levies the full term.. . "

and other bullshit like that.

Also, I am all for legalizing drugs. Quality control, tax it, put it in vending machines, put dealers out of business with a cheaper, more consistent drug. People who don't do drugs still won't do drugs, and you'll have less drugs-related street crime.

Finally, absolutely NO third party jail administration. If a company has to profit to stay in business it should not be profiting while it requires its inmates to work for free as "restitution" (or slave labor, the way I see it).

Also, because I'm against the death penalty, but for real life punishment, I'd want a special "life row" constructed: If you are sentenced to life without parole, you are put into solitary for your remaining days, no contact with anyone, no books, no tv, no lawyers, magazines, press visits, phone calls or other entertainment, just food, a shit hole and a cyanide pill should you choose to voluntarily use it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fantastic news
"It's perceived as a great political sin to represent any position besides 'lock 'em up and throw the key away,' " said state Sen. J. Chapman Petersen (D-Fairfax). "With Jim's personality, he's never going to strike somebody as being soft on crime or any other issue. For that reason, he might be better able to lead this cause. He's a pretty tough guy."

That's exactly right. It's amazing to see anyone - on either side of the aisle - stand up and talk about this. I don't see eye-to-eye with Mr. Webb on some things, but I respect him for this. I hope he succeeds in at least opening a national dialogue.

And he could tie it in with Obama's plans for the economy. Extended community service in lieu of prison for non-violent offenders could accomplish a lot of good things. It needn't even be daily: you keep at it until you've worked it off, but excessive non-attendance adds extra days of service and/or modest fines. Every community would have plenty of people on hand to overhaul old buildings, clean public areas...I could get really carried away thinking about the possibilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Proud to be the fifth rec for this. Webb is the man.
Even when I don't agree with him he is an actual maverick who uses THOUGHT to find his positions instead of voting based on some popularity-based algebra. You can tell how this confuses so many people quoted in the article...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. We've created skewed justice, that is no justice, thus no Constitution.
Justice is our first, foremost establishment in our Constitution. If we fail to treat it as such, we fail our Constitution.

That's why it can be taken away from US by Bush, and we only give mealy mouthed lip service as backlash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC