Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP, pg1: Academic Elites Fill Obama's Roster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 01:45 AM
Original message
WP, pg1: Academic Elites Fill Obama's Roster
Academic Elites Fill Obama's Roster
Critics Worry About Intellectual Insularity
By Alec MacGillis
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 7, 2008; A01

Barack Obama's chief economic adviser was one of the youngest people to be tenured at Harvard and later became its president. His budget director went to Princeton and the London School of Economics, his choice for ambassador to the United Nations was a Rhodes scholar, and his White House counsel hit the trifecta: Harvard, Cambridge and Yale Law. All told, of Obama's top 35 appointments so far, 22 have degrees from an Ivy League school, MIT, Stanford, the University of Chicago or one of the top British universities. For the other slots, the president-elect made do with graduates of Georgetown and the Universities of Michigan, Virginia and North Carolina.

While Obama's picks have been lauded for their ethnic and ideological mix, they lack diversity in one regard: They are almost exclusively products of the nation's elite institutions and generally share a more intellectual outlook than is often the norm in government. Their erudition has already begun to set a new tone in the capital, cheering Obama's supporters and serving as a clarion call to other academics. Yale law professor Dan Kahan said several of his colleagues are for the first time considering leaving their perches for Washington.

"You know how Obama always said, 'This is our moment; this is our time?' " Kahan said. "Well, academics and smart people think, 'Hey, when he says this is our time, he's talking about us.'"

But skeptics say Obama's predilection for big thinkers with dazzling résumés carries risks, noting, for one, that several of President John F. Kennedy's "best and brightest" led the country into the Vietnam War. Obama is to be credited, skeptics say, for bringing with him so few political acquaintances from Illinois. But, they say, his team reflects its own brand of insularity, drawing on the world that Obama entered as an undergraduate at Columbia and in which he later rose to eminence as president of the Harvard Law Review and as a law professor at the University of Chicago....

***

All agree that the picks reveal something about Obama, suggesting he will make decisions much as he did in the U.S. Senate -- by bringing as many smart people into the room as possible and hearing them out. This contrasts with the style of President Bush, who played down his own Ivy League credentials and played up his mangled elocutions and the gentleman's C's he received at Yale and Harvard. While Bush brought in a few academics, such as former Stanford provost Condoleezza Rice, he relied heavily on his Texas associates and business executives outside the Ivy League echelons he encountered in his schooling....

Obama, who wrote a literary memoir at age 33, represents the opposite approach. In a country where politicians often wrap their learning in folksy charm to avoid seeming elitist, his candidacy represented a forthright assertion of intellectual prowess, as he turned his oratory and cerebral demeanor into campaign assets....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/06/AR2008120600757_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is that same old bullshit "intelligent people are elitists" meme, repackaged, and rammed...
...down our throats and into our heads yet again. :thumbsdown:

The vacuum-packed, brain-dead, willing ignorants that supported Gee Duhhhbya are SKEERED to death of anyone with brains and common sense, and GOD forbid, any sense of conscience, humanity, community, morality, or empathy.


Pffft!

"intelligent people are elitist! We need some dumb, Bubba types that folks wanna have a beer with!"

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No intelligent people at CUNY? SUNY? UCSD?
It took joining the Ivy League to learn to have little or no respect for it. I had some good professors at Columbia, but none of them were better than the stellar ones I had at Queens College.

So, yeah, I think it's pretty safe to say there is a LOT of snotty elitism in these appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Same here. When I got in, I thought, "gee, what a racket! " and...
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 07:37 AM by MookieWilson
applied to the London School of Economics. Guess what? I got in! Because it is, in part, a racket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Huh?
Do these people think that because you go to an 'elite university', read high quality university, that that automatically makes you think of yourself as an 'elite person', read above the crowd, snobish. The generalization that be with high intellect or people who enjoy intellectual endeavors always hold themselves above others is ridiculous. Are there example of those that do? Sure there is but that doesn't do anything to prove this fallacious generality. Do 'intellectuals' sometimes get carried away and 'out think' themselves. Sure but at least their think and not just 'going with their gut'.I would much rather have people that are educated, intellectually curious, reasoned and have the ability to examine all side of a question and come to an informed decision (and hopefully willing to admit when their conclusions were wrong and attempt to correct them). What we don't need is another bunch of lockstep bubbas that believe if you make a bad decision that the best thing you can do is 'see it through' or 'stick to your guns' or 'stay the course' or whatever.

On the other hand, no matter whether it is the bubbas or the intellectuals doing the work it is our job as citizens to keep them honest and to forcefully point out when we think they are going off track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone who does not want the President to be a lot smarter than THEY are is
truly ignorant. Of course we know THAT was what comprised prez shit-for-brains' base, and probably that of the barracuda as well.

I think that most Americans have seen the horrific results of having someone with "the gentleman's C's" in the White House.
I think most of us have realized that it is time to have someone who actually knows what he is doing residing in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yes. someone who is literate, can read, write, and speak in complete sentences is nice...
...very much so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. They run the Washington Post too. The op-ed page is all Harvard.
For diversity, they have a few from Princeton.

It doesn't give us the best op-ed page in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. The problem with this is that Bush was Ivy League too.
So, how come it's now 'elitist'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. bu$h is an Ivy League idiot. And it's "elitist"
when Democrats are Ivy League. When dumbass "Gentlemen's C's" repubs are Ivy League - then it's not elitist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's the typical double standard then...
I wish the Republicans would get a new deck of cards or at least learn some new tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe because having greedy amoral intellectually corrupt assholes
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 11:20 AM by acmavm
has worked so well.

edit: forgot this :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC