Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Young workers do better with unions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 09:41 PM
Original message
Young workers do better with unions
Young workers do better with unions

Author: Melissa O'Rourke
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 10/23/08 17:15


For young workers who may not know what the advantages of being in a union are, the question “What’s a union gonna do for me?” was answered in a report released last week by the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

The report detailed good news and bad news. The bad news is that workers aged 18-29 have the lowest unionization rates of any age group. They have been hit hardest by the stagnant wage growth over the last three decades. This is despite a substantial increase in the number of young workers with college degrees.

The good news is young workers who are in a union make an average of 12.4 percent, or about $1.75 an hour, more than non-union workers. They are also 17 percent more likely to have employer-provided health insurance and 24 percent more likely to have a pension plan.

According to American Rights at Work, the Employee Free Choice Act would give workers a fair and direct path to form unions through majority sign-up, help employees secure a contract with their employer in a reasonable period of time and toughen penalties against employers who violate their rights. Sen. Barack Obama not only supports the legislation, but is a co-sponsor. Sen. McCain opposes it completely.

For young workers in the lowest-wage occupations, the study shows the contrast between union and non-union is even starker. The median young worker in a unionized low-wage occupation earned $10.62, almost two dollars an hour more than the $8.74 the median non-union young worker earned. These benefits also carried over into their health care coverage, where 40 percent of union workers are covered vs. less than 20 percent of non-union workers, and 29 percent had a pension compared to only 11 percent of their non-union counterparts.

http://pww.org/article/articleview/13900/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
electricD Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. union member checking in
I've been an IBEW member since '94. I first started in '87 working non-union. For 7 years I had no chance to get a raise in pay unless I jumped from one shop to another. And, to talk about insurance, it was only good if you stayed single or chose to keep your family off the insurance plan that the company used. Otherwise, it was anywhere from $10 to $30 a week off your paycheck per dependent.

I never had ANY kind of pension or retirement plan until I joined the union. I couldn't even make ends meet much less put anything into savings when I was working non-union.

Anyways, in reading this article, and having worked both sides of this fence. I realize one main factor with young workers and unions. In the past 30 to almost 40 years there has been a great job done by RW thinkers to do whatever they can to make sure to either disenfranchise and misinform people, young and old, about unions.

The main thing that I've seen is that this country was a great place for every one and employers and employees were better kept in check in almost all aspects when unions were strong.

I have never felt bitter about an employer getting rich from what I do when I work for them. But, I've always felt, that, if they want to make money off of my sweat, at the very LEAST, give me a fair share of the pie and let me provide for me and mine too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Right to work laws are anti-union
How the GOP lured the working class into opposing its own class interests should be a topic for a grad paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Retired UTU member checking in.
I went on Railroad Retirement Disability in 2003, at age 49, and have a good comfortable pension.

Not to mention the 31 years I worked at above average wages, with full benefits and job security.

100% Union then. 100% Union now. 100% Union forever.

Anybody who is against joining a union, needs to have the rocks in their head changed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electricD Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Anybody who is against joining a union, needs to have the rocks in their head changed!
I'll give a BIG, AMEN to that!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. I was at a teacher's union function today and I could count the people under 40 on one hand
The union does great stuff for them, but their communications are so dull that it doesn't grab their attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC