Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The End of Prosperity?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 09:55 PM
Original message
The End of Prosperity?
The End of Prosperity?
By Niall Ferguson Thursday, Oct. 02, 2008



Only in April 1932, amid heavy political pressure, did the Fed attempt large-scale open-market purchases — its first serious effort to counter the liquidity crisis. Even this did not suffice to avert a final wave of bank failures in late 1932, which precipitated the first state "bank holidays" (temporary statewide closures of all banks).

When rumors that the new Roosevelt Administration would devalue the dollar led to widespread flight from dollars into gold, the Fed raised the discount rate, setting the scene for the nationwide bank holiday proclaimed by President Franklin Roosevelt on March 6, 1933, two days after his Inauguration — a "holiday" from which 2,500 banks never returned.

The obvious difference between then and now is that Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has learned from history — not surprising, given that he once studied the Great Depression intensively. Since the onset of the credit crunch in August 2007, Bernanke has repeatedly cut the federal-funds rate from 5.25% down to an effective rate at one point last week of about 0.25%. He has pumped money into the financial system through a variety of channels: in all, about $1.1 trillion over the past 13 months.

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1846450-2,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Free Soup
If we had Great Depression II, do you think they would have storefronts like this used for widespread distribution of free soup, coffee, and donuts? I can't see that happening in 21st century America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's a strange phrase:
"The Bush Administration, which ran substantial deficits in the boom years, looks set to run an even larger deficit now."

What "boom years"? There haven't been any 'boom years' in the 2000s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The writer didn't want to say "bubble years", but that is what was meant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC