Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. IT Jobs Dip 2% As Downturn Hits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:46 PM
Original message
U.S. IT Jobs Dip 2% As Downturn Hits
Cuts in computer scientists and systems analysts, support specialists, and software engineers fueled the decline, a new Bureau of Labor Statistics report shows.

By Chris Murphy
InformationWeek
October 3, 2008 04:44 PM

The number of people employed in U.S. information technology jobs dropped 2% from the second quarter, one of the first signs that the broader economic slowdown is leading to IT job cuts, according to a government report issued Friday.

U.S. IT employment had kept growing over the first half of the year, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics quarterly household survey data, but in the past three months fell to just over 4 million, from 4.1 million last quarter, led by cuts in computer scientists and systems analysts, support specialists, and software engineers.

The IT job losses come amid rising unemployment across the U.S. economy, including the managerial and professional ranks. Managerial and professional unemployment hit 3%, from 2% at the beginning of the year, according to the bureau's data. IT unemployment at 2.3% is around the level it has been all year, as the pool of total IT workers -- employed and unemployed -- seems to react quickly to the availability of jobs. The overall unemployment rate stayed at 6.1%, a five-year high.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/trends/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210605650
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. great, are the vultures circling over my house yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They've been.....
Just circling at a faster rate now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. The REAL unemployment numbers are much higher than what the government puts out.
When a laid off person's unemployment compensation runs out, that person is no longer counted as unemployed, even if they haven't found a job yet.

If a person takes a part-time job at minimum wage, while still looking for full-time work, they are no longer considered unemployed. (Underemployed is not a category.)

This sleight of hand by the government was explained to me over 20 years ago by a lady who worked at the unemployment office. There were a lot of layoffs occurring in our area at the time (I even saw a former boss of mine at the unemployment office), so I spent quite a few weeks visiting that place. The lines were long.

About the time my unemployment "comp" was about to run out, I was in the line for which this lady was handling the claims. I thanked her for doing a good job, and she told me that, since a lot of people's unemployment claims were ending, the government was closing their office and laying everyone off. To say that she was unhappy, is an understatement.

REAL unemployment is easily double digits, maybe high double digits. The same fraud is perpetrated with the inflation figures. Since Cost of Living adjustments are based on the inflation rate, those figures are manipulated to be much lower than the actual increase in costs to the consumer.

The numbers are juggled in several ways. Either the mix of goods are chosen to lower the inflation figures, or the costs are weighted differently to make the inflation rate appear lower, or the quantities enclosed in a package unit are reduced by the manufacturer, even as the price per unit rises.

In the latter case, as an example, a package of ice cream I bought on sale recently was priced at $3.50 for the carton. Close inspection revealed that the carton contained 56 ounces. A year ago, the carton for the same brand contained 64 ounces.

A box of facial tissues used to contain 175 tissues. Now, even with a higher price tag, a box contains only 160 tissues.

The inflation rate is calculated using the cost of a box of tissues, not per 175 tissues purchased. So the actual increase in cost is covered up by the fact that the box contains fewer tissues.

In the case of your example, IT workers who use up their unemployment compensation are no longer counted as unemployed. Similarly, if your IT professional takes a job as a janitor (excuse me! Custodial Services Technician), then he no longer is counted as an unemployed IT worker. That is how the figures are manipulated.

As for "the pool of IT workers reacting quickly to the availability of jobs". Here's how that works. An acquaintance of mine, a database programmer, lost his job that he had for about ten years. While he was looking for a job in the IT field, which took him almost a year to find, he took a job unloading trucks at the local airport. That is how the IT worker pool reacts quickly to changes in the job market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Excellent post.
Thanks for bring to light issues that are commonly overlooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC