Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reasons mount to set withdrawal timetable (Des Moines Register Editorial)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 07:16 AM
Original message
Reasons mount to set withdrawal timetable (Des Moines Register Editorial)
Talk of setting a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq has gone on for years. In September 2004, White House candidate John Kerry's goal was to bring the troops home in his first term, while President Bush resisted setting deadlines. In the 2008 race, it's much the same: Barack Obama says it's possible to safely redeploy U.S. combat brigades in 16 months, while John McCain has steadfastly opposed scheduling a withdrawal, although he also has said that most American troops would be home by 2013.

What has changed is Iraq Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's new insistence on a timetable. It comes as the Bush administration seeks a deal with Iraq to formally authorize a wide-open, ongoing U.S. troop presence. Some sort of agreement is needed because the U.N. mandate for American-led military operations runs out at year's end.

The Bush administration should recognize that it has an obligation to outline a timetable for the orderly withdrawal of troops. The timetable can be adjusted if circumstances warrant, but the American public, the people of Iraq and their government deserve to know U.S. plans ...

... it's hard to see the purpose served by continuing to place U.S. soldiers in harm's way ...

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080718/OPINION03/807180354/1035/OPINION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sourmilk Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. With Iraqi elections this OCTOBER, they have little choice.
If you wanted to get elected as PM or as a rep. to the Parliament of the "Islamic Republic of Iraq," what would YOU be campaigning for?

US out, contractors out, military bases closed, no PSAs for oil, national control of production base, no Balkanization or partitioning...

That's the winning ticket for Iraq this October, and the LOSING ticket for McThuselah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. The purpose served by continuing to place US soldiers in harms way is to protect
Edited on Fri Jul-18-08 08:20 AM by indepat
Iraqi oil reserves which will inure to the benefit of big oil, hegemony, and provide a base of operations for other ventures in the region. See, that was not hard. :D

edited to add a word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But in polite politics, only certain thoughts may be uttered aloud
We need not confine ourselves to only these polite thoughts, for the purposes of analyzing our situation in order to organize for change -- but it may be too much to expect accurate descriptions to come from Our Glorious Ruling Class, who seem to enjoy the idea that everyone else dwells in the Land of Make-Believe

The polite thoughts, that will be uttered aloud, can be predicted in advance, something like this: Our good intentions blah blah blah A few mistakes blah blah blah Our sacrifices blah blah blah Ungrateful them blah blah blah We suffered enough blah blah blah



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC