Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Specter Of The Tapes : NFL 7 - CIA 0

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:38 AM
Original message
Specter Of The Tapes : NFL 7 - CIA 0
http://www.pjvoice.com/v33/33002nfl.aspx

...

The recent destruction of CIA tapes, which document the "enhanced interrogation" techniques used to interrogate captured terror suspects, have also been the object of Senator Specter’s attention and protest. Unfortunately, Specter’s protest does not rise to the level of Congressional contempt, the prosecution or impeachment of civilian and military personnel responsible for that destruction, nor does it extend to joining the impeachment legislation of Rep. Dennis Kucinich. or Rep. Robert Wexler. This showboat indignation has become rather a feature of Senator Specter’s most recent term in office. Before assuming the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, Specter initially indicated that he would oppose activist conservative judges, and used the Roe decision as an cited criterion case: by the time his term in the chair began, he had already denied his opposition three times by morning.

Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) says Belichick has been taping opponents' signals since 2000.
After initial protest at the national Bush-Cheney deception on Weapons of Mass Destruction, and expressing his indignation on the revelation of Valerie Plame Wilson’s covert agent CIA identity, Specter’s indignation died once again without more than token hearings. The excuses coming from the White House in these cases simply did not hold up to scrutiny. The rejection of WMD evidence by our allies France and Germany (on whose evidence, the "Curveball" WMD testimony originated) turned out to be well founded, despite the heated attestations of "slam dunk" evidence. The denial of WMD presence by United Nations inspectors (including Iraq War activist protester Scott Ritter) turned out to be thoroughly vindicated. The passive acceptance from the White House that Richard Armitage was first to reveal Plame’s identity, simply does not make sense as an excuse for Libby’s and other later revelations: if the count was for murder, and not for "revelation," there is no question that every violation of secrecy was equally criminal; the culpability is thoroughly equal, if one considers that Libby and others apparently were not aware of Armitage’s prior revelation.

One hopes that Specter’s indignation over the National Football League destruction will lead to successful prosecution for destruction of evidence. One hopes that such success will lead to the prosecution of other cases of more important national import, which so far have led Congress quietly only into the wilderness. When we read in Shoftim that we should pursue justice, intensified twice over, I do not think that Hashem was talking about a couple non-essential hearings and press releases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC