Long-Term Pact with Iraq Raises Questions

[ElsewheresDaughter]

Source: NPR.org

President Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki issued a joint letter in November. On the surface, the "Declaration of Principles" appears as a mutual "expression of friendship," as it has been characterized by administration officials.

But a closer look reveals a blueprint for how the two administrations plan to set the foundation for the future of America's involvement in Iraq.

When administration officials describe that vision, the language they use is vague. The president recently spoke of an "enduring relationship." Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice talks about "a relationship with Iraq for the long term." Defense Secretary Robert Gates outlined "a mutually agreed arrangement whereby we have a long and enduring presence."

Rep. Bill Delahunt (D-MA) says such language is vague, and he has launched a series of congressional hearings to find out what it means.

He's asked administration officials to testify but, so far, they've all either ignored him or declined. Delahunt says they have declined because he and other lawmakers want to get a sense of secret negotiations under way between Pentagon and State Department officials and their Iraqi counterparts on the future relationship between Washington and Baghdad.

Read more: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18357565

---

Bush gives a big "f-you" to rules again, signs "treaty" without congress

treaties spun as an executive agreement, OR an agreement with so much behind it, like this one.... does/has this ever happened?

[sinkingfeeling]

1. Interesting, how this will play out when a new president takes office.

[leftchick]

2. hillary and obama favor keeping "non-combat troops"

in our forever bases to "fight the terrists". I imagine they are fine with this.

[denverbill]

4. Thanks to Bush, we can ignore any treaty he signed.

After all, he just ignored the ABM treaty with Russia. Why should a future President respect anything he signs?

[focusfan]

3. you know the next president should say the agreement

is non void and get the hell out of dodge