Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dowd: Dump Cheney Now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:07 PM
Original message
Dowd: Dump Cheney Now!
WASHINGTON — The awful part is that George W. Bush and Saddam Hussein were both staring into the same cracked spook- house mirror.

Thanks to David Kay, we now have an amazing image of the president and the dictator, both divorced from reality over weapons, glaring at each other from opposite sides of bizarro, paranoid universes where fiction trumped fact.

It would be like a wacky Peter Sellers satire if so many Iraqis and Americans hadn't died in Iraq.

These two would-be world-class tough guys were willing to go to extraordinary lengths to show that they couldn't be pushed around. Their trusted underlings misled them with fanciful information on advanced Iraqi weapons programs that they credulously believed because it fit what they wanted to hear.

Saddam was swept away writing his romance novels, while President Bush was swept away with the romance of rewriting the end of the 1991 Persian Gulf war to finish off the thug who tried to kill his dad.

The two men both had copies of "Crime and Punishment" — Condi Rice gave Mr. Bush the novel on his trip to Russia in 2002, and Saddam had Dostoyevsky down in the spider hole — but neither absorbed its lesson: that you can't put yourself above rules just because you think you're superior.

more…
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/29/opinion/29DOWD.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is she nuts? Bush gets a pass? I don't think so. n/t.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Whoreen ALWAYS gives Bush a pass.
That sick slut is too busy bashing Al Gore and the Clintons.

I hope someone outsources HER job to India!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. What utter crap. Georgie was "misled." Like hell he was.
He went into office planning to take Iraq, and to move on from Iraq to Iran and Syria. He saw the US as holding the world's largest supply of oil hostage and the rest of the world begging for mercy.

He was not misled. Iraq was exactly where he intended to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It wasn't Cheney who was mad because he thought
that Saddam had threatened to kill his Daddy. Cheney just wanted the oil. Bush wanted to prove he was better than his Daddy AND the oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's amazing that once in awhile MoDo can write a coherent column.
About one out of four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I don't think this is one of them
Oh well, it's coherent enough, it's just wrong on many points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hmmm...
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 11:24 PM by grytpype
Certainly the C.I.A. has a lot to answer for. . . . They were probably relying too much on the Arabian Nights tales of Ahmad Chalabi, eager to spread the word of Saddam's imaginary nuclear-tipped weapons juggernaut because it suited his own ambitions — and that of his Pentagon pals.

This is wrong, isn't it? THe CIA knew Chalabi was untrustworthy, but Rummy and Condi and Wolfie and Dougie just loved him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. incredibly wrong. She should know better... Chalabi was the OSP's boy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. MoDo = DooDoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mecil Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Once back a year ago...
Once back a year ago I actually liked Dowds columns. Then she had latched onto Krugman's stance and was - along with him - the only voice in the mainstream media, who was critical of the Bush admin.

Which is why it's so sad to see that all she has done lately is just trash. Worrying about Mrs. Dean's ladyness and Clark's sweaters, and it seems she just continues. Wonder what got her back into the mainstream fold of "Don't blame Bush" and "Talk about irrelevant faults of the democratic candidates", someone threatened her paycheck maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. How does Dowd explain this....
DIA WARNINGS IGNORED: In September, 2002, the Defense Intelligence Agency (http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/us-dod-iraqchemreport-060703.htm) told the White House that there is " no reliable information (http://www.ceip.org/files/nonprolif/templates/article.asp?NewsID=4928) on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons." The report also said, "A substantial amount of Iraq's chemical warfare agents, precursors, munitions, and production equipment were destroyed between 1991 and 1998 as a result of Operation Desert Storm and UN actions."

DOE WARNINGS IGNORED: In September, 2002, the Energy Department's technical experts warned the White House that the aluminum tubes Iraq was seeking --the central basis for the conclusion that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear weapons program -- were ill-suited to build centrifuges for enriching uranium (http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/pdf/Iraq/declassifiedintellreport.pdf) . In fact, Secretary Powell even admitted before the U.N (http://64.4.30.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=d0956f80e6ea7a784d97d87731e8d3bd&lat=1075302281&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2ecnn%2ecom%2f2003%2fUS%2f02%2f05%2fsprj%2eirq%2epowell%2etranscript%2e07%2f) . that there was controversy over the tubes.

STATE DEPT. INTELLIGENCE WARNINGS IGNORED: In October, 2002, the State Department's Intelligence and Research Department (INR) told the White House that its WMD conclusions were inaccurate (http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/pdf/Iraq/declassifiedintellreport.pdf) . Its report said, "the activities we have detected do not ... add up to a compelling case that Iraq is currently pursuing what INR would consider to be an integrated and comprehensive approach to acquiring nuclear weapons." The Financial Times on 7/30/03 noted that this warning was specifically reiterated to Secretary Powell during the preparations of his U.N. speech, but again was ignored.

AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE WARNINGS IGNORED: While President Bush said Iraq had Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) that could spray biological weapons on American soil, the WP reported on 9/26/03 that "the government organization most knowledgeable about UAV programs - the Air Force's National Air and Space Intelligence Center - had sharply disputed that notion" to the White House, but was ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. If only the mainstream media could connect all the dots as you have and
live up to their obligation in a free society to keep the people informed in the spirit of the Pulitzer Credo, the neocons would be toast! Sadly, most will continue to shill for rather than expose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. Let's Assume Her Premise is True
and he was misled by Cheney et al. Well, you know what? That's almost as bad if not worse. That means Bush is an incompetent, buffoon and a puppet who's not in charge. What an amazing piece of apologist bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC