Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The American Prospect: Our Ballooning Terrorist Watch-List

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:17 AM
Original message
The American Prospect: Our Ballooning Terrorist Watch-List
Our Ballooning Terrorist Watch-List

The GAO reported last week that the government's watch list is growing at a clip of 20,000 records a month. That's a list four times the size of even the most liberal estimate for the number of actual bad guys out there.

Brian Beutler | November 1, 2007 | web only



In the aftermath of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the United States government compiled a list of 20 known terrorists: They were the 19 hijackers who died in the attacks and the one -- now known to be Zacarias Moussaoui -- who got away. Rapidly, however, that list grew.
President Bush called upon every agency of government to provide his administration with the names of every so-called person of concern contained in their millions of files. Those records included not just potential terrorists, but also deadbeat dads, people wanted by the federal Marshal, and Drug Enforcement Administration suspects, among others. But they all found themselves on what has come to be called the "terrorist watch list." By June 2004, that list had swelled to 158,000 names. In May of this year, it clocked in at 755,000. Today, only five months later, it's at 860,000 and counting, according to the Government Accountability Office.

The argument for maintaining such an unwieldy and quickly growing list is perhaps best voiced by cliché: better safe than sorry. But that philosophy has spawned a list that a recent GAO study found much too large to be effective, and much too inaccurate to protect the civil liberties of innocent people.

The FBI's Terrorist Screening Center manages the list, but to date, the administration has failed to establish a clear, consist methodology for government agencies to use when determining who goes on the list and who doesn't. The criteria vary widely, where they're known at all. The Central Intelligence Agency, for instance, flatly refuses to disclose its criteria for submitting a name to the list. The FBI, on the other hand, generally nominates any and all subjects of ongoing counterterrorism investigations.

In Oct. 24 testimony before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs -- chaired by Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Vt., who is typically deferential to the Bush administration on national security -- GAO's Eileen Larence noted the list is actually growing even faster than it seems. The Terrorist Screening Center told GAO it has deleted around 100,000 records from the list, but investigators are adding records so furiously that they're far outpacing the rate at which they are establishing suspects' innocence. It's two steps backward for each in the right direction.

Moreover, the list is already multiple times larger than even the most generous estimate of the number of terrorists out there. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=our_ballooning_terrorist_watchlist



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. we don't have the resources to maintain such a large list and
they need to priotize ie. not hit non terrorists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, sure............
If you consider every peace activist, environmental activist, and labour activist a potential terrorist.

And this administration appears to. Dissent is being criminalized, or haven't you been watching lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am sure the number is far greater than 860,000....
once you count all the "Liberal" bloggers, anyone who writes a letter to a newspaper that is not 100% pro-Bushie, all of us non-believers who have our phone tapped, and email read. Oh, and don't forget the DUers.

Methinks they need to hire a few thousand more true patriotic Americans to spy on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC