Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How The Bush Administration Uses Fear As A Political Tool

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:04 PM
Original message
How The Bush Administration Uses Fear As A Political Tool
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/8799

How The Bush Administration Uses Fear As A Political Tool
by Randolph T Holhut | Jul 18 2007


DUMMERSTON, Vt. — With public support for the Iraq war hovering around 30 percent, the Bush administration is falling back on a familiar strategy it loves to use when it find itself in trouble — scaring the American people.

On Tuesday, the National Intelligence Estimate, which reflects the consensus view of the 16 U.S. spy agencies, was released to the press. It states that al-Qaida is stepping up efforts to sneak terror operatives into the United States and has acquired most of the capabilities it needs to strike here.

President Bush immediately seized upon the report's findings as justification for the continued U.S. occupation of Iraq. Bush still believes that al-Qaida is responsible for the violence in Iraq, something that has been repeatedly proven false.

And, for good measure, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff chimed in last week, saying he had a "gut feeling" that another major terrorist attack was going to happen — even though he admitted that there was no specific threat to justify that statement.

The NIE was released the same day that the Senate planned an all-night session to force a vote on the Iraq war. Coincidence? Definitely not, especially when one remembers all the other times when terrorist threats conveniently materialized exactly when the administration needed a little distraction.

A couple of years ago, MSNBC's Keith Olbermann assembled a list of 10 instances when the timing of the government's terrorist alerts appeared to be more than a little suspicious. Let's take a walk down memory lane and examine them.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only 10 instances where timing is questionable?
Maybe it is psychological but I would have guessed higher than that. They used every time we turned around in 2002 and 2003, molding the people into the fear filled sheep they needed to support an illegal war.

Like me and what I do or I will beat you up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The instances in this article were from one of Olbermann's rants;
there are more now. Hopefully KO will do an update soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. the past week has been crazy
with more hamfisted fearmongering than
could fill the airwaves. Oh the shame.
Our reporters are such republican suckups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. No need to convince me the Bush Administration uses fear as a tactic.
I'm now convinced they paid for and plotted 9/11.

They had been planning Iraq long before 2000. 9/11 was soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo convenient for 9/11 to happen, particularly immediately after Cheney had all those nice meetings with the oil barons. Too frikkin' perfect. Either Cheney made a pact with the devil and the devil came through for him, or they plotted and paid to have this done. I didn't use to believe this. Now, however, I would require solid proof that they did not set this up to happen to believe they didn't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wow. The jury is still out for me, but I'm not totally convinced
they weren't involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fear: It's what's for dinner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC