Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Survey Offers Stark Perspectives on Muslim-American Identity, Loyalty"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:39 PM
Original message
"Survey Offers Stark Perspectives on Muslim-American Identity, Loyalty"
From FoxNoise:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,278334,00.html

WASHINGTON — While terrorists strap on bombs and wreak horrors half a world away, a debate continues in the United States over whether the seeds of such radicalism exist among the American-Muslim community.

Events like the arrest of a Brooklyn, N.Y., Muslim extremist last week for plotting to explode the fuel lines at John F. Kennedy International Airport, or the arrest a month earlier of men linked to an extremist group plotting to attack the military installation at Fort Dix, N.J., invigorates that debate.

A recent finding in the biggest survey ever taken of Muslim-Americans indicates that nearly a quarter of young Muslims believe homicide bombing can be justified to defend Islam, and 47 percent of all those surveyed consider themselves "Muslim first" ahead of being Americans.

Demographics breakdowns in the survey by Pew Research Center entitled "Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream" may be the greatest cause for concern, say observers. Though 13 percent of all respondents said that suicide bombing in defense of Islam was justified under certain, albeit rare, circumstances, that number rose to 26 percent of respondents between the ages of 18 and 30.


I post this more as a warning than anything else--I've seen this Pew poll twisted to become something far more sinister than it is.

The question being asked is this: "Can Suicide Bombing of Civilian Targets to Defend Islam be Justified?"

Now, I'd like for the result to be about 0%, not the 8% "Often/sometimes" or 5% "Rarely" found among all American Muslims surveyed. But ask anyone who brings up this Fox Noise interpretation: what would the result be if you changed "Islam" to "Christianity"? Think you wouldn't get any takers from the radical right?

And while you're at it, take the word "Suicide" out--really, a bombing IS a bombing--and I bet it'd climb to parity. After all, "Christians" back the bombing of civilian targets to defend "our way of life" with alarming regularity.

The Pew Poll is here:
http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf
And it's worth reading, because it's actually quite reassuring in most respects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're probably right. A slight change of the wording and demographic group would be revealing
If the question being asked is this: "Can Air or Artillery Bombardment of Civilian Targets to Defend American Troops be Justified?", it would not be surprising to see more than half of all Americans polled answer in the affirmative.

It's the word "defend" that's significant here, as defensive action is considered ethical by most theologians and statesmen, regardless of nationality or religion. It's always little cue words like that which skew the results of surveys so that they can be spun by politicians.

Pew has an agenda, here.

Not surprising, at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My own earlier post on some slanted reporting re. the recent Pew poll:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=103&topic_id=283441&mesg_id=283441

excerpt: Unfortunately, even in the report, the answers "often" and "sometimes" are conflated. Still, it's clear that only among a certain age cohort is it at all common to express support for suicide bombers. And frankly, no one should get excited about numbers down in the 2-3% range, because that's below the margin of error of the poll (5% at 95% confidence)! Pick a sample of ANY group of people in a random poll, and ask "How many are just plain nuts?" and you'll get numbers higher than that, even when the answers are voluntary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Great minds often/sometimes think alike!
Sorry for the dupe, I guess... well, sorrier i didn't see your post earlier.

But I hope we've given some other folks some ammo when they're confronted with these cherry-picked poll questions, as they surely will be in the months ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. More posts = more eyeballs. No problemo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Whoa... the villian isn't Pew
Have a look at the actual report. It's overwhelmingly positive, about how Muslims are finding their way as Americans in America.

It's Fox News and other right-wing cretins (I saw links to this story in a knuckle-dragger forum that will remain nameless) that are spinning the poll results of one (1) question out of many asked of Muslims in America.

That said, I agree fully with your sentiment that if the question were worded as you suggest, well over half--probably more like 85%--would Strongly Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC