Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: For Gonzales, More Records, and Questions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:52 PM
Original message
NYT: For Gonzales, More Records, and Questions
For Gonzales, More Records, and Questions

By ERIC LIPTON and DAVID JOHNSTON
Published: March 25, 2007

WASHINGTON, March 24 — An accumulating body of evidence is increasingly at odds with the statements of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales that he played little role in the deliberations over the dismissal of eight United States attorneys.

~snip~

The disparities are giving Democrats in Congress a rationale to transform what started as an inquiry focused on the ouster plan itself into a much broader and perhaps even more damaging look at misleading, or at least inaccurate, statements by the key Bush administration figures involved in the effort.

“It is hard to see, given what the documents say and given what he said before, how you can square the two,” said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, who is leading the inquiry in the Senate. “An attorney general, more than any other cabinet official, has to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”

~snip~

“That is the classic conundrum that people get into, they obfuscate, or don’t tell the whole story and that itself is what becomes the legal controversy,” Mr. Brand said. “The shifting story of what is at the bottom of these decisions on the United States attorneys is the primary reason that Congress keeps grinding away. That is always the fuel for these investigations.”

~snip~

Other documents released in recent weeks appear to contradict the claim that politics played no role in the firings. That includes a notation in one document that Mr. Rove wanted one of his former aides — a lawyer with little experience as a criminal prosecutor, but who had worked extensively with the Republican National Committee — named as the United States attorney in Arkansas, a request that required the firing of the official already in the job, who the Justice Department has since acknowledged was not removed for performance reasons.



more:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/washington/25attorneys.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rusty_parts2001 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fasten your seatbelts
Edited on Sat Mar-24-07 02:07 PM by rusty_parts2001
This is going to be a bumpy ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC