Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Family Values' Chutzpah by Harold Meyerson. It's not the permissive '60s. It's the Reagan '80s.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:40 AM
Original message
'Family Values' Chutzpah by Harold Meyerson. It's not the permissive '60s. It's the Reagan '80s.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/06/AR2007030601600.html

<snip> As conservatives tell the tale, the decline of the American family, the rise in divorce rates, the number of children born out of wedlock all can be traced to the pernicious influence of one decade in American history: the '60s.

The conservatives are right that one decade, at least in its metaphoric significance, can encapsulate the causes for the family's decline. But they've misidentified the decade. It's not the permissive '60s. It's the Reagan '80s.

Yet the very conservatives who marvel at the efficiency of our new, more mobile economy and extol the "flexibility" of our workforce decry the flexibility of the personal lives of American workers. The right-wing ideologues who have championed outsourcing, offshoring and union-busting, who have celebrated the same changes that have condemned American workers to lives of financial instability, piously lament the decline of family stability that has followed these economic changes as the night the day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. We've come to the very heart of the matter what fuels the engine of the
neocons: Roll back the 60s. Eradicate any influence in the culture made by "hippies", "dopers", "radicals", "women's libbers", "uppity blacks", trade unionists, etc. Return the bland, homogenous, racist, xenophobic, communist-fearing, reactionary 50s.

They want more than our money, more than power for their 1,000 year Reich. They want the culture and to control our personal lives through government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But, and this is major difference- They want to keep the outsourced economy
The 50's saw the rise of the (white) middle class, Real Union power, affordable housing, construction of freeways, cheap gas and cars....What they would be going to is a feudal oligarchy with a few ultra rich and layers of poor, each oppressing the ones less fortunate than themselves. With a collapsing infrastructure, massive debt, endless wars...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. To take away our money and our security is to ensure that once the
culture's changed, it can't literally afford to change back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly! Unions had power in the Fifties and that

raised other salaries/wages as well. The Fifties were "Happy Days." In the Fifties, wives didn't have to work, one income was sufficient. The GOP has always been anti-union because conservatism is all about cheap labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC