Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Co-Dependent Congress Must Wake Up: The President Needs a Straitjacket and a Padded Cell

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 09:51 AM
Original message
Co-Dependent Congress Must Wake Up: The President Needs a Straitjacket and a Padded Cell
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/791


by Dave Lindorff


It's time to simply admit the obvious: The president of the United States is crazy as a loon, and the Congress and the media are functioning as co-dependents as he runs the country off a cliff.


Bush says in his latest press conference that he is "certain" that Iran is providing "technically sophisticated" roadside bomb weapons to Iraqi insurgent forces to help them kill Americans.
He probably is "certain." But nobody else of consequence in the government is, and the evidence to support his claim is simply not there....Shaped charges are not sophisticated. They can be made in a garage. A Navy engineer invented the technology in 1888. It was widely used in World Wars I and II and Vietnam, and was even provided by the British to the IRA in a botched sting operation that led to being disseminated around the world to every conceivable resistance and terror organization. Instructions on how to make these weapons are available on the Web. A high school student could do it in shop if the teacher wasn't looking.....On top of that, the people who are primarily responsible for killing Americans in Iraq are Sunnis, who are certainly not the beneficiaries of Iranian government assistance, since Sunnis are killing Shias, who are the ones Iran is close to.


None of this matters to Bush.


Why? Because he's crazy. Reality and Bush are wholly different worlds, people.


When you have a person who is off his nut in a position of authority, whether it is in your house, your office, driving a car, or running your country, you need to do something to prevent them from causing harm. It won't do to say, "It's too much trouble to confront him," or "He'll get angry if I challenge him."

This seems to be the attitude in Congress and the media. The Democrats, who could put the president in a richly deserved straitjacket, are afraid to take that step. The media are afraid the president and his crazy backers would howl if they pointed out how nutty he has become.

So they all let him rant on, as though he were making sense.

The problem is that this president is also the commander-in-chief. He has ordered three heavily armed (and nuclear-equipped) carrier battle groups to the Persian Gulf and is talking about "dealing" with Iran. We all know what that means. He wants to attack Iran and expand his disastrous war in the Middle East to put us at war with another 70 million people.

Experts are saying we can expect this to happen in mid March or April! They say this even though there are no facts that could justify such a criminal act.

But facts don't matter to this megalomaniac.

There is only one proper response to having a lunatic in the White House, and that is to get him out of there, and to prevent him from doing harm to himself and others. What ought to happen is Bush's medical team should have him declared incompetent. Since that is unlikely to happen, we're left with two other alternatives. One would be for the military leadership of the nation to recognize Bush's orders (should he order an attack on Iran) to be contrary to International Law and to disobey him. That seems unlikely, though it is to be profoundly hoped for.

The other is for Congress to recognize its co-dependent behavior and take action, filing impeachment bills and getting the process of impeachment hearings underway.

Since the president has clearly broken the law in the case of the National Security Agency spying he ordered, and since he has clearly abused his power and violated his oath of office with his signing statements, there is really no need for prolonged hearings. An impeachment panel could quickly vote out articles of impeachment on these two issues and send them to the full House for a vote. If they did this, I suspect they would find at least some honorable and patriotic Republicans voting with them. At that point, the issue could go to the Senate for trial. Meanwhile, the impeachment panel could continue with hearings into Bush's other crimes and misadventures: the lying about the Iraq War; the torture authorization; the violation of habeas corpus; the cover-up of the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame; the lies to and obstruction of the 9-11 Commission; the abandonment of New Orleans to its fate during and after Hurricane Katrina; the war profiteering in Iraq; etc., etc.

The first step, however, is to acknowledge that the president has lost his mind and has become a dangerous psychopath.

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION


Dave Lindorff is co-author, with Barbara Olshansky, of "The Case for
Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from
Office," (St. Martin's Press, 2006). His work is available at
www.thiscantbehappening.net and at
www.counterpunch.org.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. You are way too generous
Edited on Thu Feb-15-07 09:55 AM by TechBear_Seattle
I would have said an iron maiden (and I'm not talking about the band or his wife) and a dank dungeon cell. With rats.

Hungry rats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. He'll be amongest his own
that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Straightforward and absolutely correct. But WHY won't Congress do it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Cowards? Lazy? Complicit? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. No honorable and patriotic Republican, or Democrat for that matter, has voted in lockstep to the
beat of our drummer for: even cursory analysis of the handiwork would show the entire agenda has been the antithesis of honor and patriotism. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrmidon Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. "a botched sting operation"?
It sounds to me like the British were arming the IRA for some old-fashioned false flag terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Fourmi_Rouge Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. There is only one problem with this idea:
The deal-breaker comes in the following line:

"If they did this, I suspect they would find at least some honorable and patriotic Republicans voting with them."

Yeah, Right! The same howling loons who have marched blindly behind this nutjob for 7 years? Not likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. Look at the Bush White House as a for-profit operation and it makes sense.
If you value human life, truth, and justice, then Bush appears to be insane. If you value profit, power, domination, and unaccountability, then it makes perfect sense.

Just check Cheney's Halliburton stock value.

I mean, isn't it absolutely obvious? I honestly don't know if people are reducing it to what it is. When you hear "The President" you sadly, automatically assign positive qualities and expectations to the person with the title, and their motives and goals. This is a sadly outdated delusion, and we are depending upon it to kick in to save us from escalating the wars in the middle east, and the potential retaliations (that BushCo would profit from at all levels).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's Piracy, Not Profit
They are just transferring our wealth into their pockets, and providing nothing in return. Any thug can do that.

To make profit, you have to make a real difference in people's lives, for the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Mm, I'm not sure that the term "profit" automatically means beneficial to all
but I'll gladly accept it as such as it sets a positive precedent in these days of blatant piracy.

(I just don't want BushCo to have any fun on "International Talk Like a Pirate Day", is all.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Every Day is Talk Like a Pirate Day at BushCo!
PiratesRUs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC