Iran Strike 'Would Be Disastrous'
by Michael Stetz
Criticism
The US and its Western allies suspect Iran of using its nuclear energy programme as a cover to produce atomic weapons. Tehran denies this claim.
Recent criticism by President George Bush of alleged Iranian support for insurgency in Iraq has increased concerns that his administration is contemplating an attack. The consequences of military action against Iran are not only unpalatable, they are unthinkable Former Labour minister Stephen Twigg In the report, Time to Talk: The Case for Diplomatic Solutions on Iran, the coalition accuses Mr Blair of using the prospect of military action as a negotiating tool.
Launching the report, former Labour minister Stephen Twigg, director of the Foreign Policy Centre, said: "The consequences of military action against Iran are not only unpalatable; they are unthinkable.
"Even according to the worst estimates, Iran is still years away from having a nuclear weapon. "There is still time to talk and the prime minister must make sure our allies use it."
Coalition
The charity Oxfam, unions Unison, GMB and Amicus, have been joined by the Muslim Parliament and Christian Solidarity Worldwide in signing the report. Iranians like America, However, that can change overnight if the US attacks Iran They warn that a strike against Iran would continue to destabilise the region and provoke further attacks against British forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"Military action is not likely to be a short, sharp engagement but could have a profound effect on the region, with shock waves felt far beyond," the report says.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0205-03.htm