Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time for Congress to Act on China’s Economic Repression

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 09:10 PM
Original message
Time for Congress to Act on China’s Economic Repression

http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/02/02/time-for-congress-to-act-on-china%e2%80%99s-economic-repression/

Time for Congress to Act on China’s Economic Repression

by James Parks, Feb 2, 2007

The Bush administration’s failure to aggressively act to stop China’s systematic repression of workers’ rights and human rights, currency manipulation and export subsidies has led to record trade deficits and the loss of thousands of jobs in the United States. Now it’s time for Congress to do something to protect U.S. workers from the impact of China’s policies.

Testifying before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs this week, AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka said:

Every year, I or one of my colleagues is invited to testify on these important economic issues. Every year, the trade deficit worsens, more jobs are lost and the economic pressures on workers and the middle class continue to grow. And every year, someone from the administration responds with pledges of increased dialogue and cooperation.

The AFL-CIO, U.S. manufacturers and many experts maintain that China deliberately undervalues its currency, the yuan, to keep its value artificially low so it can export products at an artificially low price—running up the U.S. trade deficit and costing good American jobs.

The 109th Congress did not act on a bill introduced by Reps. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) and Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), which would have given the government new tools to address currency manipulation and would clarify that such manipulation is an illegal subsidy under World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. The Bush administration’s U.S. Trade Representative also rejected a petition by the AFL-CIO and business and farm leaders that asked the president to take action to curb China’s currency manipulation.

The first step in getting the nation’s policy on China moving in the right direction, Trumka said, would be for this Congress to immediately consider and pass the Fair Currency Act (H.R. 782), which Hunter and Ryan reintroduced Jan. 31.

An AFL-CIO report shows China’s fixed currency rate artificially lowers the price of its goods by 40 percent and subsidizes exports, putting U.S. companies at a disadvantage. The lack of currency flexibility has been a major factor in U.S. job losses and a trade deficit with China that experts predict will exceed $230 billion this year.

Yet, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who has traveled several times in the past few months to China without gaining a single meaningful concession in China’s economic or human rights policies, testified before the Senate committee that China is not manipulating its currency. Paulson’s testimony prompted this response from Trumka:

Either there is something wrong with the criteria Treasury is using to determine currency manipulation, or there is something wrong with the Treasury Department’s math.

I would like to ask Secretary Paulson and his staff exactly what it would take for Treasury to find that a country had in fact manipulated its currency, and–perhaps more important–what it would take to move beyond yet another round of endless diplomacy and strategic dialogue to concrete action and results.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC