The neoconservative blunder of the century (PAUL WOODWARD)

[laststeamtrain]

The neoconservative blunder of the century
Paul Woodward, The War in Context, January 18, 2007

In terms of strategic blunders by the Bush administration, the invasion of Iraq would seem to be in a league of its own. Even so, it is quite possible that the administration's biggest error in judgment came soon after the invasion when under the stranglehold of neoconservative ideology, the White House passed up an opportunity to make a "grand bargain" with Iran.

The 2003 offer from the Iranians is now back in the news, but it has been written about several times before. Yet although the contents of the document describing the terms of this offer have been discussed at length -- such as in Gareth Porter's extended analysis in The American Prospect -- the text of the document has not widely been reproduced. For that reason I included the full text below.

More recently, this subject was central to an op-ed by Flynt Leverett (former senior director for Middle East affairs at the National Security Council), that the White House only allowed the New York Times to publish after removing references to the Iranian offer. This, in spite of the fact that Leverett had already published a paper on this and received CIA approval for that publication.

In light of the Bush administration's current bellicose rhetoric directed at Iran, it's worth looking carefully at the golden opportunity that in 2003 Bush and Cheney tossed out.

At that time, the neocons seemed convinced that having secured an "easy victory" in Iraq, they would soon be able march on and topple the Islamic regime in Tehran. The Cheney gang was in no mood for reconciliation. Yet had they not become delirious with power, they might have recognized a diplomatic prize of unparalleled proportions. Indeed, it's conceivable that had a bargain then been struck, what has since unfolded as an Iraqi disaster might have turned out in a very different way. Not only that, but another war -- between Israel and Hezbollah -- would likely have been avoided.

Stories about what never happened are easy to ignore, but at a time when tensions between the United States and Iran are mounting dangerously, it is critically important that more Americans learn about what an Iranian government was capable of offering and what a priceless opportunity the White House foolishly squandered.

<more>

http://warincontext.org/2007_01_14_archive.html#116908820381620345

[applegrove]

1. Very astute. *WH was drunk on War at the start. They could do no wrong. And

went ahead and did one wrong thing after the other.

[struggle4progress]

2. Ya cain't be a war prezdint widdout a war nor a great war prezdint widdout a Great War

Bigtime Dick and his cronies didn't want a solution: they wanted a conflagration ...