Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Limiting Family Planning for the Poor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Gene C. Gerard Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 03:40 PM
Original message
Limiting Family Planning for the Poor
Last week President Bush appointed Dr. Eric Keroack to serve as the Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for Population Affairs. This position is primarily responsible for overseeing the Office of Family Planning, which is charged with providing access to contraceptive information and supplies to low-income individuals. But Dr. Keroack has a long-standing opposition to contraception and abortion. Through this appointment, President Bush will severely limit contraceptive information and choices to many of America’s poorest women.

Dr. Keroack was previously the medical director of “A Woman’s Concern,” a non-profit organization operating crisis-pregnancy centers in Massachusetts. According to its literature, A Woman’s Concern works to encourage “abortion-vulnerable women” to go through with their pregnancies. The organization characterizes contraceptives as “demeaning to women.” Consequently, A Woman’s Concern doesn’t provide information regarding birth control at its clinics, and advocates sexual abstinence until marriage.

It appears as if Dr. Keroack’s chief qualification, in the eyes of President Bush, for his new position is his strong support for abstinence-only sex education. In a presentation at the 2003 International Abstinence Leadership Conference he indicated, “Pre-Marital Sex is really modern germ warfare.” And in 2004, while criticizing the American Medical Association’s support for comprehensive sex education, Dr. Keroack proclaimed, “For the first time, we have found a high quality sexual education that has actually begun to reverse these deadly trends – abstinence education. Why would we want to stop it?”

Since taking office the Bush administration has channeled more than $600 million into abstinence-until-marriage sex education programs. Yet no scientific study to date has demonstrated that curriculums that only promote abstinence actually curtail teenage sex. In 2001 the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development released a monumental study of approximately 100,000 teenagers who had taken an abstinence pledge. The study found that after 18 months most broke the pledge by engaging in sexual intercourse. And since they didn’t plan on doing so, the majority failed to use contraception.

Still, Dr. Keroack has maintained, “Abstinence education is the first mechanism that has actually made a positive impact on the devastation caused by the errant sexual education programs of the 1970s and 1980s.” But there’s simply no evidence to support this. Last year, the Texas Department of Health conducted a review of abstinence-only sex education programs in that state. The review concluded that the programs had “little impact” on teenagers’ behavior. In fact, the review found that girls in the ninth grade were actually five percent more likely to engage in sex after being exposed to an abstinence-only curriculum. And boys in the tenth grade were 15 percent more likely to engage in sex after participating in abstinence-only classes.

The Office of Family Planning is mandated to provide a broad range of acceptable and effective family planning methods and services. Given this responsibility it’s troubling that A Woman’s Concern, the pregnancy centers Dr. Keroack previously supervised, has repeatedly been accused of deceptive practices. The attorney general for Massachusetts has received numerous complaints in the past two years from women who maintained that they were misled by the pregnancy centers. The complaints indicate that women were told by A Woman’s Concern that they perform abortions, but once the women arrived for their appointments they were accosted and told that they were “killing babies.”

Dr. Keroack used the clinics to pioneer his technique of showing ultrasound images of fetuses to women to encourage them not to have abortions. He previously compared this technique to car repairs. In a letter written to the Massachusetts legislature in 2001 Dr. Keroack maintained, “Even Midas lets you look at your old muffler before they advise you to change it.” It’s difficult to believe that someone so biased can impartially oversee the federal government’s provision of contraceptive services.

Equally controversial, Dr. Keroack has compared teenage sexual activity to drug use. In 2001 he theorized that engaging in sex prevents teenagers from developing emotional relationships, owing to an overproduction of the hormone oxytocin. According to a paper co-written by Dr. Keroack, “Just as in heroine addiction, the person involved will experience sex withdrawal and will need to move on to a new sex playmate.” But the scientific community rejected his theory, largely because it was not based on research conducted on teenagers, but rather on small rodents found on the Great Plains.

The Office of Family Planning oversees a yearly budget of $288 million and operates a national network of approximately 4,600 clinics, providing reproductive health services to five million persons annually. For more than 30 years these family planning clinics have played an important role in ensuring access to contraceptive services for low-income and uninsured women at no cost or at a reduced cost. Under the direction of Dr. Keroack, the services and information provided by the clinics will substantially decrease. President Bush has demonstrated a calloused disregard for the nation’s poor with this appointment.
_______________________________________________________________________

Gene C. Gerard writes a political blog for the progressive world news website OrbStandard at http://www.orbstandard.com/GGerard.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Theres-a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Prairie dog studies?!
Nice going,awol.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcking Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not even prairie dogs.
Voles -- field mice or meadow mice. Average life span 6 months or less.

But regardless of the validity of the oxytocin research (and Keroack's dubious conclusions), this is just one more in a long list of men who think they know what's best for women. "A woman's concern," indeed!

Don't get me wrong. I am aware of many fine male gynecologists and obstetricians. But when they start preaching to women about what they "should" do in regards to their own bodies, it's power, not medine, they're concerned about.

If he's against contraception, he has no business going into gynecology, much less becoming the head of the Office of Family Planning.

Orwellian, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. You're right on
About POWER, and not medicine, being their top concern. I'm sure at the fundie iniversities, there are "biology" majors being encouraged to go to med school so that they can do their part in the part against abortion, and psychiatry, and all those other evils of a godless America.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting to contrast this guy's attitude with this bill
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x247435

where there's a genuine attempt to decrease the number of abortions by improving access to contraception - or reducing poverty as a reason to have an abortion. Keroack sounds like he'll end up increasing the number of abortions with his ham-fisted attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is this Assbag still being allowed to apoint ANYONE?
Can't we stop the damage already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken Top Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The Insanity continues
My God, will it never end? Just when you think it can't get worse--it does. Now we have a lunatic opposed to contraception in charge of family planning. The government is spending $600 million annually to tell people not to have sex!!! All this from a party that "wants to get government off your back!" Another freaking lie.
It's been said bosses hire people like themselves and now we have clear evidence of that. One lunatic appoints one just like himself. The asylum is overflowing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
civildisoBDence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. DUHbya should appoint this guy to oversee family planning
among Arabian horses.

Newsprism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShotInTheDark Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. "...works to encourage 'abortion-vulnerable women'
...to go through with their pregnancies."

^ Good. Dr. Eric is definitely onto something here.

Why snuff the life out of a fetus quickly, when one can kill the wretched thing slowly over a few decades?

Sheesh, already getting horny. Such possibilities, time to drive the lightning rod down to Las Vegas for a soon-to-be shotgun wedding!

Conception at 130 miles per hour!

Again, Dr. Eric is onto something, but I'm unsure whether its a prescription, or an illicit, type of commitment from our good ole Dr. K. But who cares about facts and statistics, just so long as the honorable doctor is having a nice trip, right?


Dr. Keroack maintained, “Even Midas lets you look at your old muffler before they advise you to change it.”


Thanks for the reminder, Doc. For nobody wants a piece of bad hardware getting in the way of good sex!

My advice to you, Dr. K, is that ya better cash in right now, cause the bottom will soon be falling out of the coathanger market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. "Bush Appoints Baby Broker to Family Planning Position"
should be the headline on this article. These kinds of "pregnancy support" clinices have one goal only; to provide babies to couples wanting to adapt. They might christian this, and support the parents that but the people they are really looking for is young white girls with salable babies.

Once they have a pregnant woman on the hook they then bid out the baby to waiting couples by charging them "document fees" of over $10K. While the fees might be couched as donations desperate parents-in-waiting know all too well that if they don't put up the cash the baby will be reffered to another couple.

You will never ever catch them supporting a single mother keeping her baby. You will never catch them supporting a single woman with a kid or struggling couple a year after the "rescued" baby is born.

These people are sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. here they come again--climbing up between our legs and poking
around.

i thought they call themselves the party of small government, less invasive, less intrusive. shit! why don't they just climb into bed with the rest of us so they can oversee our behavior.


oh wait. they already did.


can't they hear the entire country yelling: GET OFF ME! YOU'RE ON MY HAIR!


oh never mind. i'm just tired of being screwed by the gop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. A simply appalling appointment.
I guess it is right in line with appointing a man who hates the UN to be the ambassador to the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. And those who hate government
should run the government. Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. ...and those who hate medicine...
should practice medicine :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. and those who hate birth control
should be in charge of family planning.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. This guy and his followers are nuts. I was working on some
genealogy this week by finding census records. I found at least 3 ancestors who had more than 12 children each and I have one man who had three marriages and a total of 24 children. Now just think what this country would be like if that had continued. Birth control has allowed many families to be lifted out of poverty and meant that women would live to an older age. The man with 24 children went through 3 wives because he lost the first two in child birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC