Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times Op-Ed- Making Sure the Money Goes Where It's Supposed To

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:03 PM
Original message
NY Times Op-Ed- Making Sure the Money Goes Where It's Supposed To
This is very good. Some points that need to be in the forefront of national and world debate, imho.

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Making Sure the Money Goes Where It's Supposed To
By ANTHONY RICHTER and SVETLANA TSALIK

Published: December 4, 2003
merica has always lusted after a secure energy supply. Against a background of deteriorating relations with the Arab world, which holds the largest oil reserves, the United States is casting about for new sources of oil in countries like Venezuela, Nigeria, São Tomé and Azerbaijan. With Saddam Hussein gone, Iraq could also become a major supplier.

So intense is the need for oil that the United States often turns a blind eye to problems of governance in those countries — whether the leaders are corrupt, abuse human rights or block any moves toward democracy. This inaction amounts to complicity. It undermines, rather than enhances, American energy security, since repressive regimes are prone to being violently overthrown by people who resent the United States for supporting their oppressors.

It is one of the great paradoxes that countries rich in natural resources tend to have lower growth rates, more debt, worse governance and greater political unrest than their energy-poor neighbors. Vast petroleum profits without oversight allow corruption to flourish. Nigeria, for instance, has earned more than $250 billion for its oil in the last 25 years, yet remains mired in poverty. In Turkmenistan, gas revenues are deposited into a foreign account controlled by the president for life, Saparmurat Niyazov, international financial officials say. These kinds of governments do not make for stable energy suppliers.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/04/opinion/04TSAL.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. what a revolutionary concept! think it'll catch on?
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 02:49 PM by cosmicdot
"...the United States often turns a blind eye to problems..."

'often' is surely an understatement

my sarcasm goes on:

corporate boardrooms must fret daily with these concerns ... constantly seeking ways to turn that blind eye in the proper direction to match the corporate and citizenship responsibilities promoted on their websites and such

the article cited a 25-year period as a measure ... 25 years!

it's so important that Cheney's Energy documents are fully disclosed ... in them, likely, is the blueprint for their foreign policy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
this probably is the most important posts of the day if not this period in time ...

it's the essence of so many problems and issues





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those who do not learn history...
In the 16th and 17th century, Spain imported TONS of gold, silver, and other valuable things from thier colonies in the Americas...
And went bankrupt! They spent money faster than they could steal and ship it.
Many oil-rich countries are doing the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Some of this is true in parts of the U.S.
"It is one of the great paradoxes that countries rich in natural resources tend to have lower growth rates, more debt, worse governance and greater political unrest than their energy-poor neighbors."

Sounds like the South and West when they're focused on extractive industries. Not exactly building anything, educating anyone, developing a middle class, etc. Just a few landowners and cheap labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Please! The proper terms is not
'Just a few landowners and cheap labor.'

It is 'Noblemen and Peasantry'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC