Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Parry: New Clues in the Plame Mystery (Rove & Armitage Linked!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:05 PM
Original message
Robert Parry: New Clues in the Plame Mystery (Rove & Armitage Linked!)
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 12:06 PM by autorank

New Clues in the Plame Mystery


By Robert Parry
September 15, 2006

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/091506.html

A well-placed conservative source has added an important clue to the mystery of the Bush administration’s “outing” of CIA officer Valerie Plame after her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, became one of the first Establishment figures to accuse George W. Bush of having “twisted” intelligence to justify the Iraq War.


The source, who knows both White House political adviser Karl Rove and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, told me that the two men are much closer than many Washington insiders understand, that they developed a friendship and a working relationship when Bush was recruiting Colin Powell to be Secretary of State.

In those negotiations, Armitage stood in for Powell and Rove represented Bush – and after that, the two men provided a back channel for sensitive information to pass between the White House and the State Department, the source said.

The significance of this detail is that it undermines the current “conventional wisdom” among Washington pundits that Armitage acted alone – and innocently – in July 2003 when he disclosed Plame’s covert identity to right-wing columnist Robert Novak, who then got Rove to serve as a secondary source confirming the information from Armitage.
===============

This is one of the great investigative news sources. They’re short $15k of the $20 they need to make it through election 2006. If you can GIVE please:

http://www.consortiumnews.com/cont.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. The media koolaid drinkers who keep portraying Armitage as
"not a partisan gunslinger" are full of shit. Armitage is the best of the best at dirty politics and a PNAC'er from the get go. Powell's relationship with Armitage is not as long as Armitage's relationship with the wing nuts of the party. Of course he was in with Rove and Cheney and they did the Plame thing together.

After the shit hit the fan it gave Rove an opportunity to diminish the role of Libby and Cheney with regard to Bush and advance himself and his loyalists. He just had to burn Libby. I always wondered, and now am certain, about the role of prosecutor Fitz. He became a tool of Rove and was essential in the plan to protect Bush by protecting Rove. The inside the WH plan (which needed help from Armitage because Powell would not have participated) was to diminish Cheney's sway with Bush. It worked - Condi was elevated, Karen Hughes still has a job, Rove was not indicted, Cheney has been sidelined, etc. etc. etc. and Libby was thrown under the bus as a result of this insider fight for power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Good analysis.
I thought that there was either a huge mistake in having Armitage take the fall or that it was part of some larger scheme. I'd hoped the former were true since Armitage would be a great witness. However, it seems more like the latter, which you outline so well. I wonder why we can't get this type of commentary and reporting in the corporate media. Oh, right, they all work for the same bias.

Excellent post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. BBBBBBut that means NoFacts AGAIN had.......... NO FACTS!
Why am I not surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktlyon Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw Armitage on TV early in this misadministration
I thought he was inarticulate and sounded like a bite of a thug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC