Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If 9-11 Hadn't Happened, Where Would the World Be?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 08:49 PM
Original message
If 9-11 Hadn't Happened, Where Would the World Be?
By GWYNNE DYER
LONDON -- Five years since 9/11, and we are still being told that the world has changed forever. But the attack on the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, was a low-probability event that could just as easily not have happened. The often careless and sometimes incompetent hijackers might have been caught before boarding those planes, and there were not 10 other plots of similar magnitude stacked up behind them. Would the world really be all that different now if there had been no 9/11?

There would have been no invasion of Afghanistan, and probably no second term for President George W. Bush, whose main political asset for the past five years has been his claim to be leading the U.S. in a Global War on Terror. Deprived of the opportunity to posture as a heroic war leader in the mold of Winston Churchill or Franklin D. Roosevelt, Bush would have had great difficulty in persuading the American public that his first-term achievements merited a second one.

Would Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz & Co. have succeeded in invading Iraq anyway? That was high on their agenda from the moment they took office, but without the 9/11 attacks eight months later, they would have had great difficulty in persuading the American public that invading Iraq, a country on the other side of the world that posed no threat to the U.S., was a good idea. Whereas after 9/11, it was easy to sell the project to geographically challenged Americans: Maybe no Iraqis were involved in 9/11, but they're all Arabs, aren't they?

So no Afghanistan, no Iraq -- and probably no Israeli attack on Lebanon either, because that was pre-planned in concert with the U.S. Hezbollah's kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers and the killing of three others in a cross-border raid in late June was a major provocation, but the Bush administration had already signed off on an all-out Israeli air assault to destroy Hezbollah months before. All they needed was a suitable excuse, which Hezbollah duly provided. But assume no Bush second term, and that also doesn't happen...

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/eo20060913a1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vicman Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, the question is, once again...
MIHOP or LIHOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. OK, until the point when the article veers into anti-semitism.
Which makes me NOT want to follow the link and read the rest of it.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Any criticism of the Israeli government is anti-Semitism?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No, bullshit statements like this are:
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 09:30 PM by Redstone
"that was pre-planned in concert with the U.S."

Got some proof? Or does the author of that article have some proof?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't know what his sources are, but Gwynne Dwyer is
usually pretty well-informed. His commentary for CBC (on the late, lamented Newsworld International) during the initial invasion of Iraq was comprehensive, with lots of historical and recent event background, and no love for the Bushies.

His PBS series on War many years was excellent. He's no ideologue.

Who knows, his sources for that assertion may be from inside Israel itself, but as I said, I don't know. I certainly have no trouble believing that the Bushies would encourage Israel to invade Lebanon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianeG5385 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. We, most definitely would still be in Iraq
I don't know what ploy would have been necessary to get us there, but there would have been a catalystic event. This was a KNOWN item, that Bush was going to Iraq, before Bush was elected so NO ONE can claim ignorance.

Many in the news media lusted after war reporting and fake heroism. Plus, it boosts ratings. It had been 10 years since the last big cable news event, the 1991 Gulf war, which MADE cable news and CNN. Makes you wonder where these folks loyalties lie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. 9/11
If we did not have the attack on the twin towers, no amount of fudging would have re-elected bush. The totals against him would have been too darn great for them to make up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. In a war in Iraq
it was a given when bush got in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. There would've been bigger anthrax attacks!...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. How Weak You Are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Very Rovian.
Well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC