Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Phila. Inquirer: Happy Labor Day?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
fencesitter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:22 AM
Original message
Phila. Inquirer: Happy Labor Day?
Edited on Mon Sep-04-06 10:35 AM by newyawker99
The great pay divide

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/15434894.htm

As Americans try to enjoy an extra day off in celebration of the working man and woman, they might not want to consider what's happening to the fruits of their labor.

In short, Americans are working more effectively: Productivity is up solidly. But wages are not.

In the 10th edition of its The State of Working America, released Saturday, the liberal Economic Policy Institute paints a daunting picture with a fusillade of statistics.

The median family's real income (wages with the effect of inflation on purchasing power figured in) fell 3 percent between 2000 and 2004, the last year for which numbers were available. That's in contrast to steady increases in this figure from 1979 to 2000.

During most of America's long run as an economic powerhouse, income has increased in step with productivity, the output of goods and services per hour. Productivity grew 2.5 percent per year from 1995 to 2000, and family income grew 2.2 percent annually during that same period. Productivity jumped to 3.1 percent a year from 2000 to 2005. But Americans didn't see a similar jump in pay.

Overall, the share of national income due to wages and salary has dropped steadily since 2000. What share increased as workers lost? Corporate profits. And, yes, many shareholders are workers, too. But this method of distributing the fruits of productivity clearly increases income inequality.

More at link...
--------------------------------------
EDIT: COPYRIGHT. PLEASE POST ONLY
4 OR 5 PARAGRAPHS FROM THE
COPYRIGHTED NEWS SOURCE PER DU RULES.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good Editorial,...
----- Very succinct. That the Bush administration has operated to the exclusive benefit of the top 1% of the income strata may no longer even be seriously questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC