Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK Troops risk their lives in Land Rovers MoD sells off armoured vehicles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:20 AM
Original message
UK Troops risk their lives in Land Rovers MoD sells off armoured vehicles

Sun 27 Aug 2006


A FLEET of armoured vehicles has been sold abroad for just £44,000 despite the ongoing scandal of British troops forced to patrol war zones in thin-skinned Land Rovers.

The MoD sanctioned the sale of 14 mine-protected Mamba vehicles, which originally cost £4.5m, after an expensive revamp left them "too heavy" to go on patrol.

The financial loss to taxpayers is another embarrassment for the MoD but far more serious is the suggestion it could have put the lives of British troops at even greater risk.

At least 20 soldiers have been killed in attacks on lightly protected Land Rover patrol vehicles in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and there have been widespread complaints that UK forces are not getting enough protection.

Opposition parties last night raged that it was "unforgivable" for the government to dispose of a fleet of heavily armed vehicles so cheaply when British troops were facing such dangers.

more:http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1263052006

And today:
Iraq roadside bomb kills two British soldiers

James Sturcke and agencies
Monday September 4, 2006
Guardian Unlimited


Two British soldiers were killed and a third was seriously wounded in Iraq today, the army said.
The soldiers died when their patrol was hit by a roadside bomb north of Basra, Major Charlie Burbridge said. The soldiers were travelling in an armoured Land Rover, commonly known as a "snatch vehicle".

"It appears a roadside bomb was used to attack the convoy," Maj Burbridge said. "They were in a snatch vehicle. They have been designed to protect the crew against a certain threat and on occasion they have been defeated."

more:http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/story/0,,1864675,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Further proof my uncle is useless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. If you watch some of the videos
at Ogreish.com (yeah I know sick s**t) it doesn't look like even the abrams tanks can stand up to some of these devices. But if I were there I'd prefer them giving me the overweight vehicle and letting me scrap some of the less than effective armor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC