Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Judge OKs Law Signed by Bush Even Though the House Never Voted on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:49 PM
Original message
Federal Judge OKs Law Signed by Bush Even Though the House Never Voted on
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/analysis/091

Federal Judge OKs Law Signed by Bush Even Though the House Never Voted on It. We Need a Real Judiciary Again
Submitted by BuzzFlash on Mon, 08/14/2006 - 3:19pm. Analysis
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS

Last Friday, Federal District Judge John D. Bates conducted yet another feeble judicial capitulation to the Bush Administration when he ruled that it was acceptable for the president to sign a bill that had not been passed by Congress.

As many BuzzFlash readers may recall, a clerical error created a $2 billion discrepancy between two versions of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, which each respectively passed the House and Senate by the slimmest of margins. The mistake was quickly identified, but Bush rushed to sign the stingier copy - which cut two years off of Medicare coverage for certain medical equipment - despite being warned in advance that the bill he was about to approve had only been voted on by one half of Congress.

This isn't the first time Judge Bates has demonstrated his partisan agenda in a courtroom. As a deputy to Whitewater prosecutor Ken Starr during the 1990s, Bates helped override executive privilege to secure evidence from the Clintons. As one of Bush's early federal court selections not long afterwards, he ruled that Tricky Dick Cheney didn't have to reveal to congressional investigators who was on his energy task force or what they did because of executive privilege. Last year Bates refused relief for Omar Khadr, a Canadian citizen captured in Afghanistan at the age of 15 and sent to Guantanamo Bay as an "enemy combatant," who simply wanted to stop interrogation techniques such as beatings, threats of rape, and the use of his body as a "human mop" to wipe urine off the floor (Bates said this "would present a grave risk to the public interest"). Bates also ruled that the recording industry could acquire the names of online music downloaders from internet service providers, although his decision was later overturned on appeal.

To his credit, Bates did stand up to the White House once, demanding that they make some response to credible allegations that Ahmed Abu Ali, an American citizen, was being held in Saudi Arabia on Bush's behalf in order use torture to extract a confession. When they were unable to do so (they never even tried), Ali was finally extradited and tried in an American court with most of his rights. Nevertheless, this may have been an instance when illegalities were so egregious that Bates was unable to look the other way, and its unclear how little of an explanation he would have accepted in order to leave Ali to rot oversees as he did to Khadr.

It's still probably a safe bet that Bates is otherwise onboard with the Bush agenda. After all, Chief Justice Roberts quietly appointed him to the secret United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court last Febuary - nobody else knew until someone noticed Bates' online biography had been updated with the information a month later. Unfortunately, Bates took the old spot of Judge James Robertson, who quit in protest after it was revealed Bush had been bypassing the court to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens without warrants.

THERE'S A LITTLE MORE--WORTH READING!

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, that's an activist judge if there ever was one. Can't he be
overruled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He is most definitely NOT an activist judge!
By definition, activist judges work against the will of Our President and Savior. Judge Bates is a true American patriot, not an activist judge! Why do you hate America, traitor?

(And if it wasn't obvious... :sarcasm: :hi: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. What was I thinking? How could I have been so blind? A thousand
pardons. You won't tell anyone, will you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. The f*cker would be impeached if the Congress were to do their job
IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Truly appalling. Kicking. (no text)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC