This is an excellent essay describing the recent use of phrases like "Islamo-Fascists" and how meaningless and inappropriate they are. It also compares and contrasts conditions associated with fascism with those in the Middle East and in the US. I found it interesting and recommend reading the whole thing (not that long).
Neo-conservatives decided that World War III is to be waged against "Islamic-Fascists" or "Islamo-Fascism."
(...)
Neo-con pundits follow a clever strategy of deflection. They employ the term "Islamo-Fascism" when "theocracy" or "dictatorship" or "fundamentalist movement" would be more historically accurate. Why do they do this? Their political epithets are inspired by a subtle conditioning campaign.
Perhaps it's subconscious projection. "Projection," of course, is a defense mechanism that kicks when someone is threatened by, or afraid of, their own impulse. So they attribute these impulses to someone else. Do not be neo-conned. How can you help?
First, always replace the term "neo-conservatism" with "neo-fascism."
(...)
Third, remind people who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" that the term is historically inaccurate and that the main ingredients of classical fascism - 1) monopoly capitalism; 2) erosion of democracy; and 3) militant nationalism - are coming together in the United States like a Perfect Storm.
(...)
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/article.php?sid=27303&mode=nested&order=0