Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrew Bosworth: Welcome to Neo-Fascism 101

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 02:34 AM
Original message
Andrew Bosworth: Welcome to Neo-Fascism 101
This is an excellent essay describing the recent use of phrases like "Islamo-Fascists" and how meaningless and inappropriate they are. It also compares and contrasts conditions associated with fascism with those in the Middle East and in the US. I found it interesting and recommend reading the whole thing (not that long).

Neo-conservatives decided that World War III is to be waged against "Islamic-Fascists" or "Islamo-Fascism."

(...)

Neo-con pundits follow a clever strategy of deflection. They employ the term "Islamo-Fascism" when "theocracy" or "dictatorship" or "fundamentalist movement" would be more historically accurate. Why do they do this? Their political epithets are inspired by a subtle conditioning campaign.

Perhaps it's subconscious projection. "Projection," of course, is a defense mechanism that kicks when someone is threatened by, or afraid of, their own impulse. So they attribute these impulses to someone else. Do not be neo-conned. How can you help?

First, always replace the term "neo-conservatism" with "neo-fascism."

(...)

Third, remind people who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" that the term is historically inaccurate and that the main ingredients of classical fascism - 1) monopoly capitalism; 2) erosion of democracy; and 3) militant nationalism - are coming together in the United States like a Perfect Storm.

(...)


http://www.smirkingchimp.com/article.php?sid=27303&mode=nested&order=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
manhunter2006 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree..
I agree. Islamo-Fascists is a bad and incorrect labeling of the
enemy facing western civilization. Strident, militant, Islamic Fundamentalism is
a more accurate description of the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. The PNACers Are Jumping on Calling Everyone Fascists
because they have been publicly outed on this site and others. The truth is gaining ground and respect, and so the Rove, et al, thinks to confuse people by calling everything fascist and thus debasing the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Absolutely correct!! I always say, "neo-cons, more properly described
as neo-fascists".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very well-written article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. From no-bid contracts to preventative war, the NeoConz...
... should rightfully be referred to as the prophylactic wing of the Republican party. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC