Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A message to the GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 07:42 AM
Original message
A message to the GOP
Edited on Sat Aug-05-06 07:47 AM by Algorem
("True Father" Sun Myung Moon must be worried)

TODAY'S EDITORIAL
August 5, 2006

http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060804-091358-1950r.htm

In the summer of 2000, when the congressional campaigns were heating up, Republicans held a relatively comfortable 55-45 advantage in the Senate. That July, Georgia Sen. Paul Coverdell, a former Peace Corps director and a rising star in the Republican leadership, unexpectedly died after suffering a stroke. Georgia's Democratic governor replaced him with a Democrat, and the Senate balance became 54-46. Although a few Republican incumbents faced tough challenges, on the eve of the election Republicans were expected to capture Democratic-held Senate seats in Virginia and Nevada, which they did. That meant that Democrats would have had to win seven Republican-held seats to achieve majority status.

To the surprise of many, Democrats won six of those seven races by capturing Florida's Republican-vacated open seat and ousting five Republican incumbents in Delaware, Minnesota, Washington, Michigan and Missouri. Montana's Republican Sen. Conrad Burns narrowly won re-election with 50.6 percent of the vote, setting up a 50-50 tie in the Senate but giving Republicans control by virtue of Vice President Dick Cheney's tie-breaking vote.

This summer Republicans again control the Senate by a 55-45 margin. Democrats will need a net gain of six seats to capture majority status, which they briefly enjoyed for about 18 months after James Jeffords, Vermont Republican, became an independent and began caucusing with the Democrats in June 2001. In the 2002 elections, the Republican Party regained its Senate majority (51-49) and added four seats in 2004.

When an electoral wave occurs, it is usually accompanied by one party winning a disproportionately high share of the close races. As Michael Barone observed in the 2004 edition of the Almanac of American Politics, "Republicans won a majority in the Senate in 1980 because they won 11 of the 13 closest races. They lost that majority, with the same seats up, in 1986 when they lost six of the eight closest races." Six years ago, if the Democrats had prevailed in Montana, they would have won nine of the 11 closest races and control of the Senate. Winning eight of the 11 tightest races did not cut it in 2000. Six years later, the same seats are up for grabs...




Wednesday, March 30, 2005
Sun Myung Moon Calls for End to Democracy

http://adreampuppet.blogspot.com/2005/03/sun-myung-moon-calls-for-end-to.html

John Gorenfeld has a great blog dedicated to watching Sun Myung Moon, whose organization has a weird hold over extreme rightwing politics in this country. In the latest blatant outrage that is totally ignored by the MSM, we learn that Moon is finished with American democracy and is working to replace it.


Moon: Work with congressmen to "discard" democracy

The Washington Times owner's most recent of many consistent entreaties to toss democracy on the scrap-heap along with Communism:


The United States is proud of its democratic system, which carries the idea of brotherhood. She has to adopt the ideas of Parents and Godism. We have to discard relationships that resulted from the Fall...


http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/moon.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Actually...
...Moon's abhorance of democracy makes perfect sense. That should be the true conservative position, favoring monarchy or military dictatorship (structural authoritarianism) over democracy (structural liberalism).

At least he's consistent...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC