Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Band of Brothers Unravels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:12 PM
Original message
The Band of Brothers Unravels
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 02:13 PM by underpants
Soldier Accused of Civilian Murders Defends Actions

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/IraqCoverage/story?id=2265742&page=1

Aug. 2, 2006 — Twenty-two year old Pfc. Corey Clagett believed that the matter had been resolved. After two internal inquiries evaluating a mission that took place in northern Iraq on May 9 this year, he and three other soldiers from the 3rd Battalion of the 101st Airborne Division expected to return to their duties without a stain on their characters.

Speaking by telephone from his prison cell, in an exclusive interview with Nightline, Clagett defended his actions and expressed anger towards the military for pressing charges against him.

The transition has been all the more astounding when it emerged that his accusers had come not from the Iraqi populace but from his own battalion - the tightly-knit and fiercely-loyal 'band of brothers.'

Clagett, along with Sgt. Raymond Girouard and Spc. William Hunsaker — all members of the Fort Campbell, Ky.-based 3rd Battalion — have been accused of deliberately releasing three Iraqi men they had captured, in order to kill them. Another soldier, Spc. Juston Graber, has admitted to carrying out the "mercy killing" of one of the detainees after the initial shooting.

-WHAT FOLLOWS IS NOT MEANT (by me) AS A DAMNATION NOR AS AN EXCUSE-

Think about being dropped into this world for a second

Three of the accused soldiers, along with others in the unit, then make a remarkable claim in their sworn affidavits. They say they received unusual but unequivocal rules of engagement (ROE) for the task ahead. They claim that they were given repeatedand explicit orders to "kill all military-age males."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. What the hell?
Nobody's ever heard of a POW anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. "War of attrition"---where have we seen that before?
or another, possibly more apt phrase would be "ethnic cleansing".

Both are crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please don't call them band of brothers
We who served with the 101st disowned these lowlife's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. LBN rules you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bad apples. Gotta protect Rummy, the torture director
and war criminal. I'm not defending or damning them either. I wish they had disobeyed but the fact is I believe them because too much has come out to support that all the crimes were not just sanctioned, but were explicitly ordered. I bet this goes right down the memory hole with Abu Ghraib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Your "all-volunteer" service in action.. LOTS of wackos
just love the idea for being handed a gun and getting to kill people legally.. MOST people are NOT like this, but the fact that the military is desperate to accept as many people as possible, makes it a perfect place for this type of person to be.

My guess is that people who flunk out of the police/sheriff/highway patrol/fire academies(because of the psychological testing) would gravitate towards the military...

These adrenaline junkies look at the military to get the training needed so they can join up with DynaCorps/Blackwater and make the "big bucks"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I don't think it's that at all
Yes, what these men did is vile and even sociopathic.

But war itself is sociopathic. People obey what they percive a sa "higher power' who they might not have even met to justify killing untold numbers of people they have also never met nor are necessarily a threat to them.

And that's true of any military.

But somehow I think we would have noticed if there were hundreds of millions of socipaths runnign around. and the odds that all these sociopaths just happened to join the afrmed forces of thier respective countries?

No, these people were made, not born. Made into just the way the Pentagon needed them be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's true, BUT military life appeals to a lot of the sociopaths
who would like the opportunity to kill... What other "occupation" would attract these people? (Legal occupations)..

Probably 99.9 percent of people in the military are NOT like this, but the remaining ones who do this sort of thing cast a shadow over all of them :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. "...using women and children as human shields."
Eventually they came upon a house where a man was looking out of the window. He was shot immediately. They then advanced to a second property where they found three men hiding, using women and children as human shields.

It's interesting how casually they throw in that "human shield" claim. Is it possible that the men were simply hiding with women and children and not actually using them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obeying an illegal order
Is still a criminal act!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, but this means they're going down swinging.

They're not supposed to obey illegal orders, but the point remains; they were given illegal orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yes, but an order (if it can be substantiated) changes a *lot*
First off, it's a *tremendous* mitigating factor for sentencing. Secondly, it can put the accused in a position to trade some leniancy for their testimony against those who gave the order. Finally, in some cases a soldier can plead duress for following an illegal order, particularly if he or she then reports the incident (which it appears these guys did not).

The "mercy killing" angle is a different matter; the law on that is frankly unclear and has been for centuries, though the US military is very clear that a soldier is generally not qualified to determine if a wounded person has any chance of survival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. About "illegal orders"
When I was in the Army (90-93) we were told repeatedly "you have to follow the order THEN you can complain about it" well being the dumbasses that we were we thought that was the deal.

Now, recently I have read all kinds of comments here and elsewhere about how soldiers don't have to do this or that.... uh let's see I am in a pre-op briefing with my "band of brothers" or just an ordinairy platoon/squad and *I* stand up and tell the Lt. that that is an illegal order and that *I* don't have to follow it??? Sounds great but where is this mythical soldier supposed to sleep that night? How well do you think that is going to go over in his highspeed Hoowah unit? Doesn't being in such a unit greatly diminish the chances of there being the standsup sniffing pushes glasses back on his nose and says "Excuse me Sir but according to regulation.... " type even being there?

I am so sick of hearing about what people would do IF they were there. I know there is a basis for this but please.

Again this is not meant as an excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC