Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Catastrophic Success of Bush's Other War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bennet Kelley Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 12:26 AM
Original message
The Catastrophic Success of Bush's Other War

The Catastrophic Success of Bush’s Other War



Months before the start of the Iraq War, President Bush was already a “war president”. This war was not about terrorism or democracy in the Middle East, but instead, as Vice President Cheney explained in pushing for tax cuts regardless of deficits, it was about getting “their due”. In this war, Bush could truly declare “mission accomplished,” but the toll to the nation in terms of dollars and lives lost could exceed that of the Vietnam, Korean and Iraq Wars combined

Getting “their due” means nearly $2 trillion in tax cuts which save millionaires nearly $50,000 annually at the expense of record deficits. Ninety-nine percent of Americans, however, received zero net benefit from the tax cuts, as the amount they received was more than offset by their share of the increase in the national debt.

Getting “their due” means showering Halliburton and other cronies with government contracts by increasing contracting to record levels and doubling the number of no-bid awards resulting in nearly $750 billion in contracts marked by fraud and mismanagement. The administration, however, has show little concern over this abuse because getting “their due” also means making the world safe for corporate lawbreakers by eliminating “responsible contractor” rules requiring agencies to take into account “violations of labor, employment, environmental, or consumer protection laws”; shifting the $1 billion annual cost for cleaning up hazardous waste sites from the polluters to the taxpayers and substantially reducing regulation and enforcement.

While commentators have used a lot of fancy labels such as “crony capitalism” and “trickle down economics” to describe this governing philosophy, the looting of the government by the wealthy elite at the expense of all other Americans sure sounds like a class war to me.

Class war skeptics should not be so quick to dismiss class war claims as election year demagoguery when there is ample evidence that this is exactly what is occurring but has escaped media scrutiny because much of it takes place in the tall weeds of the bureaucracy. Skeptics should consider the gross disparity in the administration’s tax enforcement policies where recipients of the Earned Income Tax Credit program, which provides tax credits for the working poor, were the target of half of all audits in 2005 and over 20 times more likely than millionaires to be subject to an in person audit. Or compare the administration’s seeking nearly $10,000 in fines against Catholic missionaries traveling to Cuba, while fining a coal mining company only $440 for “significant and substantial” safety violations that led to the death of a miner.

We should not hesitate to call this a class war since like all wars its costs are measured in both dollars spent and lives lost. The financial toll of this war is well known as the Congressional Budget Office is now projecting deficits beyond 2016. Class warriors will continue to make sure that everyday Americans bear the cost of “the haves and have mores” getting “their due”, as was demonstrated this spring when the administration fought off attempts to increase taxes on oil companies enjoying record profits, but was happy to triple the tax rate for students.

What is rarely discussed, however, are the human costs to this war. For example, Bush’s “Clear Skies” proposal to weaken existing Clean Air Act standards for older power plants would result in an additional 20,000 premature deaths from respiratory illness each year, while his weakening of sewage treatment rules is certain to increase the 900 deaths per year from waterborne infections.

Similarly, cuts in health programs under Bush have contributed to the record number of uninsured Americans and an estimated 2,700 additional premature deaths each year, while Bush also has blocked proposed health and environmental regulations that would save lives and ignored workplace safety and sanitation violations that have contributed to a number of deaths. In a single year, these few examples combined would be approximately half of the total number of Americans killed in the Vietnam War and over eight years would be the equivalent of wiping out a city the size of Providence or Salt Lake City.

President Bush once referred to the Iraq War as a “catastrophic success,” but this paradoxical statement more aptly describes his class war which truly has been the principal war of this administration. This is why the Republicans must rely on distractions such as gay-marriage and flag burning to obscure the calamity and devastation that is occurring.

Democrats will not pierce this fog by using labels in text books, but rather by plainly describing an ongoing class war which is counter to the American ethos of fairness and equal opportunity. If Democrats are going to end this “catastrophic success”, they need to make sure that this election is about the real issues involved - including both the war in Iraq and the war at home - so that on Election Day voters can decide whether a government of the few by the few and for the few is really “their due”.

Bennet Kelley is the former National Co-Chair of the Democratic National Committee’s young professional arm and publisher of BushLies.net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. You saying Bush does not have the best interests Americans at heart?
I am totally not shocked because you are right, he does not.

Now I know the man probably has trouble reading but one would think a good Christian like him would have heard something about helping the poor and being merciful that Jesus told us followers of Him to do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. G'day mate. Welcome to the cackle factory.
I was going to congratulate you as a newbie on a well thought out piece, but then I saw your sig. New to the nut house but not the greater fray.

Great piece anyway.

Keep them coming, I think we need a wholely serious veiwpoint or two. Wit is all well and good but I know of a number of perople who might be more open to the message if they weren't immediately turned off by "cleverness".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurgedVoter Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
always good to have another thinker on board. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. bu$h's only success is to fuck up the nation for generations
America may never recover from this fiscal disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R--exactly!
Well done piece. Would you consider submitting to Wyoming's statewide paper, the Casper Star-Tribune? Good chance they'd run it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennet Kelley Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Follow Up
I'd definitely consider the Casper paper, although most papers prefer original submissions (and shorter as well). If you have info on submissions for the paper, send it along.

Thanks to all of you for your comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Here you are.
http://www.casperstartribune.net/contact/editorial.php


I'd try giving a call to the opinion editor, Kerry Drake.

Kerry Drake, opinion editor - kerry.drake@casperstartribune.net - (307) 266-0582

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. I hope you have a lot of sway with the DNC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RonHack Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Another reason for the tax disparity....
"...Skeptics should consider the gross disparity in the administration’s tax enforcement policies where recipients of the Earned Income Tax Credit program, which provides tax credits for the working poor, were the target of half of all audits in 2005 and over 20 times more likely than millionaires to be subject to an in person audit."

That may be because, as reported here earlier, the IRS laid off half of their lawyers dedicated to auditing those millionaires' tax returns, even though statistically they are far more likely to cheat on their taxes than the rest of America.

Class warfare? I should say so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. It IS a class war!
And THEY are winning! (No surprise--THEY have the money.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Getting "their due"
and here all this time I though the Repukes were against "entitlement" programs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danhan Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. I am new to posting here as well
but not new to reading on this site.

This is an excellent post but I could never use it in my discussions (unlike others here at DU I prefer to discuss rather than argue :-))

Can you source your statistics such as "20,000 premature deaths" and "certain to increase the 900 deaths per year from waterborne infections" and "an estimated 2,700 additional premature deaths each year."

I would get thrown off my barroom debate team if I were to throw out such things with no back up from credible sources!!!!

This is the first I have seen of your writing. I look forward to more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennet Kelley Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Data & Methodology
Thanks. I will post links and a summary of my methodology in the next day or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennet Kelley Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Source Data & Links
Source material for the number of deaths is as follows:

(1) 20,000 additional deaths from "Clear Skies" proposal
Source: Clear The Air
http://www.cleartheair.org/proactive/newsroom/release.vtml?id=24900

(2) 9,000 deaths from waterborne illness
Source: NRDC
http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/cwa30/cwa30.pdf

(3) 2,700 additional deaths for uninsured
Source: Institute of Medicine
http://www.amsa.org/uhc/AMSAUninsuredPrimer.pdf
The Institute estimated 18,000 deaths per year based on 2,000 data. The 2,700 figure is based on the 15 percent increase in uninsured under Bush.

(4) Workplace TB standards is an example of a life saving regulation thwarted under Bush.
Source: OMB Watch
http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/684/1/261?TopicID=1

(4) Bush's lack of enforcement has led to miner deaths and food illness.

http://hughesforamerica.typepad.com/hughes_for_america/2006/01/the_preventabil.html

http://www.foodproductiondaily.com/news/ng.asp?id=28903-us-inspector-blames

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=98617


These are just a few examples. A comprehensive study would yield many more.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danhan Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. No, Thank you
I appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC