Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld's OpEd and my LTTE in response

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:54 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld's OpEd and my LTTE in response
Edited on Wed May-24-06 11:57 AM by reichstag911
I received the confirmation of authorship call from the Sun-Times within a few hours of emailing my LTTE, but it has not yet appeared. Naturally, I'd like it to!


Birth of a free press is victory for Iraqis, @ http://www.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi?getReferrer=http://www.suntimes.com/output/otherviews/cst-edt-ref16.html
May 16, 2006

BY DONALD H. RUMSFELD

In the early months of 2003, as the coalition offered Saddam Hussein's regime a final opportunity to comply with the United Nations Security Council, an Iraqi nicknamed "Baghdad Bob" served as a spokesman for Iraq's Information Ministry. He was not exactly a poster child for accuracy.

When coalition troops took control of Baghdad's airport, this spokesman was on television denying they were there, saying such reports were "lies" or "a Hollywood movie." Even when shown video footage of U.S. soldiers on Saddam's parade grounds, just around the corner from where he was standing, "Baghdad Bob" said, "There is nothing going on." So outlandish were his assertions that he became a ridiculous celebrity of sorts. Some enterprising folks even set up a Web site and sold CDs with some of his statements.

Of course, reporters' experiences with Iraq's regime were usually not amusing. Iraqi journalists had to be members of the ruling Baath party as well as an organization called the Journalists' Union, chaired by one of Saddam's sons. Any reporting considered insulting to Saddam was punishable by death. On occasion, journalists' tongues were cut out. In 2000, in what must have been a bitter joke to the Iraqi people, Uday Hussein -- a butcher and tyrant and one of Saddam's sons -- was "elected" Journalist of the Century.

Even in a region of the world known for tightly controlled societies, Iraq consistently ranked as one of the most oppressive when it came to the press. That included foreign journalists as well. A CNN executive much later admitted that he had downplayed the crimes of Saddam's regime to avoid getting kicked out of the country.

<snip>


And my response:

Dear Sirs:

Thank you so much for the opinion piece by Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld in Monday's paper, although I thought it should have more properly been in the Comics section. Oh, the high hilarity of Sec. Rumsfeld pontificating on the virtues of a free press and the benefits accruing to the Iraqi people -- those we haven't killed yet, that is. Don, you wacky funster, you kill me!

After all, to speak of a "free" press in Iraq while the Dept. of Defense is paying to plant "good news" stories, true or not, is rich. And Rumsfeld's characterization of "Baghdad Bob" as something less than a "poster child for accuracy?" On its own, that should get him a show on Comedy Central. With the whoppers he's told, we should be calling Rumsfeld "D.C. Don." This is the man, remember, who famously said on Meet the Press, then denied having said it, "We know where (the WMDs) are; they're in the area around Tikrit,...." When a genuine advocate of freedom, former career CIA officer Ray McGovern called out Rumsfeld on his mendacity, Don could only stammer inanities in response. His allusion to the "bitter joke" of Uday Hussein being "elected" Journalist of the Century was a highlight, too; there are many who can recall a more bitter joke of an "election" in 2000, and that one put Rumsfeld in his current office.

I could go on, sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph, pointing out the absurdity of this pathologically power-hungry PNAC ideologue spreading the gospel of Iraqi freedom, but I will sum it up by pointing out his byline: he is the U.S. Secretary of Defense, and should be more concerned about American freedoms than the Iraqis'. When the bureaucracy in which he "works" advocates prosecuting journalists who publish stories of the administration's illegal activities, something is dramatically wrong, and Don should worry a little more about the freedom of our American press.

Best,
---me---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Things are so bad in Iraq that they can't pay anybody to be the
"Voice of America" propaganda "reporter" there. So much for a press, much less free in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Free press? Hell, the US paid good money
for that propaganda . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Somrthing is indeed dramatically wrong ...
... with press freedoms in THIS country when the Bush junta seeks to prosecute the press for exposing the truth about its illegal activities.

BTW, good letter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. I look forward to reading it in the paper
it's a good letter, just enough sarcasm and wit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC