Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vexed to Nightmare, The Unholy Union Behind the War on Terror

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:49 PM
Original message
Vexed to Nightmare, The Unholy Union Behind the War on Terror
http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd05222006.html

The web lit up last week with stories about how the New York Times, and the Bush Administration, had information in the summer of 2001 that specifically foretold of an impending, spectacular attack by al Qaeda "perhaps to be visited on the continental United States"--information which both august institutions declined to share with the public. The stories have rightly drawn much attention for the new light it throws on the years-long decline of the Times--and on the surpassingly curious inaction on the part of the Bush Administration during that fateful summer, despite an intelligence system "blinking red" with warnings of an impending attack.

But there is another very important part of the story that seems in danger of being overlooked. In an interview with Alternet, former NYT reporter (and Bush Regime misinformation conduit) Judith Miller tells how an intelligence source told her, during the 2001 July Fourth holiday weekend, about an intercept of a conversation of two al Qaeda members. As Miller recounts it: "And they had been talking to one another, supposedly expressing disappointment that the United States had not chosen to retaliate more seriously against what had happened to the Cole. And one Al Qaeda operative was overheard saying to the other, 'Don't worry; we're planning something so big now that the U.S. will have to respond.'"

What is the key fact here? Not really that al Qaeda operatives were planning a big operation against the United States; they'd been trying to do that for years, including one thwarted spectacular involving the mass hijacking of airplanes. No, what is truly significant, I think, is this passage: "They had been.supposedly expressing disappointment that the United States had not chosen to retaliate more seriously against what happened to the Cole," a destroyer hit by a deadly suicide bomb attack in a Yemen harbor the previous October.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a slight detour
from this OP, but I distinctly remember hearing on the news on the way to work in August, 2001, that the United States government announced that there were indications that a large terrorist attack was being planned against US interests, perhaps inside the country.

Does anyone else remember this? It was about three or four weeks before 9/11.

T-Grannie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. don't remember that BUT my RW brother told me the evening of 9-11
that US had been told by many govts and intelligence services that some big attack on the US was coming.....he knew that then, so I assume it must have been pretty widely known

NOTE: I report this as an example that many on the right were aware, even if W 'wasn't'....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC