Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intel committee sidelined on wire-tapping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 07:19 PM
Original message
Intel committee sidelined on wire-tapping
This report is from a couple of days ago, but it looks like a significant development. Who's the parliamentarian?

WASHINGTON, March 27 (UPI) -- The chairman of the powerful Senate Select Committee on Intelligence believes congressional officials were mistaken to refer a bill dealing with the president's program of warrantless counter-terrorism surveillance to a rival panel.

"Chairman (Pat) Roberts's (R-Kan.) strong position is that this decision was incorrect," said a senior committee staffer, who asked not to be named.
.....
The Senate Parliamentarian, a little-known but influential official who makes decisions about the legislative procedure for Senate bills, referred the bill -- S2455, GOP Ohio Sen. Mike DeWine's Terrorist Surveillance Act of 2006 -- to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, after a great deal of behind-the-scenes negotiations, according to other senate aides.
.....
The DeWine bill would create a list of terrorist organizations designated by the president. Anyone that the government has probable cause to believe may be "an agent or member ... affiliated with ... or working in support of" one of those groups is liable to be wiretapped.

"Why restrict it to terrorist groups?" pondered one committee insider. "There are criminal organizations or nation states that might also pose a serious enough threat to warrant inclusion."

http://www.upi.com/inc/view.php?StoryID=20060327-030420-7157r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Roberts is upset that Specter's committee gets to deal with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Roberts assignment is...
to bury everything implicating the administration. This is NOT a turf battle, IMHO,
but a bald-faced (-headed in his case) attempt to cover-up the multitude of sins
committed by the BushCorp. Arlen may not be the most enthusiastic truth-seeker
either for that matter. We GOTTA take the House in November!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. oh, I totally agree with you (He is Mr. phase II man recall).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC