Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: "Kabuki Congress"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:56 AM
Original message
NYT: "Kabuki Congress"
Editorial
Published: March 6, 2006

Imagine being stopped for speeding and having the local legislature raise the limit so you won't have to pay the fine. It sounds absurd, but it's just what is happening to the 28-year-old law that prohibits the president from spying on Americans without getting a warrant from a judge.

It's a familiar pattern. President Bush ignores the Constitution and the laws of the land, and the cowardly, rigidly partisan majority in Congress helps him out by rewriting the laws he's broken.

In 2004, to take one particularly disturbing example, Congress learned that American troops were abusing, torturing and killing prisoners, and that the administration was illegally detaining hundreds of people at camps around the world. The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, John Warner, huffed and puffed about the abuse, but did nothing. And when the courts said the detention camps do fall under the laws of the land, compliant lawmakers simply changed them.

Now the response of Congress to Mr. Bush's domestic wiretapping scheme is following the same pattern, only worse.......MORE.......

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/06/opinion/06mon1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. The rule of men, and not of law. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. and it is what is happening with port issue (i have not read the article-
maybe they talk of it also).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. The America we knew is going.
It's an awful thought, but look at what the bushies have done, and gotten by with. Where is the stopping point? How much do we have to lose before we can start gathering our rags about us and try to put this country back together? It makes me sick to know our rights are being taken away by some hired hand, and his partisan congress, who aren't worth their paychecks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. it's gone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Congress rewriting the foreign-intelligence law the way Mr. Bush wants.


..There were glimmers of hope on the House side. Representative Heather Wilson, the New Mexico Republican who heads one of the subcommittees supervising intelligence, called for a "painstaking" review of the necessity and legality of the spying operation. But the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Peter Hoekstra, is turning that into a pro forma review that would end with Congress rewriting the foreign-intelligence law the way Mr. Bush wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirty Hippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Congress? I think "Politburo" is a better name n/t
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 02:26 PM by Dirty Hippie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. In the fascist state, the legislature turns into a cheering section.
Yes, according to the law, it exists. Yes, according to the law, it needs to approve. But what's written down doesn't mean shit. Hitler had his Reichstag, Stalin had his Congress, and it was all for show. The sole function of the de jure legislature was to symboilcally represent the nation backing the Great Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC