Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scottie in Denial: White House Still Clinging to “Same Intelligence” Myth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:37 PM
Original message
Scottie in Denial: White House Still Clinging to “Same Intelligence” Myth


http://thinkprogress.org/?tag=Iraq


Scottie in Denial: White House Still Clinging to “Same Intelligence” Myth

Yesterday, the final nail was placed in the coffin of the White House myth that Congress saw the same prewar intelligence as President Bush. A Congressional Research Service report found that the Bush administration had access “to a far greater overall volume of intelligence and to more sensitive intelligence information, including information regarding intelligence sources and methods.”

But today, when asked about the CRS report, Scott McClellan pushed the same spin on “same intelligence”:

MCCLELLAN: We provide the Congress a lot of intelligence information, and they did have access to the same intelligence that we saw prior to making the decision to go into Iraq.

In fact, even the White House admits this isn’t true. As McClellan went on to acknowledge a moment later, Congress did not have access to the Presidential Daily Briefs (the intel summaries President Bush receives each morning). The White House says this fact is irrelevant, however, because those briefs were found to be even “more alarmist” and “less nuanced” than the intelligence Congress had:

MCCLELLAN: I saw there’s a reference to the Presidential Daily Brief, where the Silberman-Robb commission already addressed that issue and said that, if anything, that the Presidential Daily Brief was less nuanced than the intelligence that members of Congress saw and that we saw as well.........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. it hard work keeping track of lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. What does it matter if the PDB's are "Less nuanced"

The idiot doesn't read or pay attention to them anyway.

Maybe they ought to wrap them around a rubber mallet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. scottie hasn't been told what the new spin is yet...
...and he'll keep pushing the old spin out the door until Rove or Cheney tells him to change the tune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. The PDB is not the only intel the President sees, ever.
And it's stupid to argue otherwise. Very stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Scottie's not lying
of course they saw the same intelligence the Shrub saw. The difference is Shrub or somebody up there also saw the reports with the doubts and questions about the intel. This is the part that Congress wasn't allowed to see. It was most definately cherry-picked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC