Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wikipedia needs safeguards that work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 09:22 PM
Original message
Wikipedia needs safeguards that work
Jimmy Wales has often described himself as the constitutional monarch of Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia written and edited by volunteers. Queen Elizabeth II of England and other constitutional monarchs can only intervene in affairs of state on rare occasions of great crisis. Wales, who co-founded the non-profit Wikipedia in 2001, exercised his royal power last week. But he only took a tiny step in the midst of a crisis where bolder leadership is required.

Wikipedia keeps getting in trouble because its open model -- where anyone can write and edit entries -- is an invitation for character assassination, ideological crusades and outright vandalism, as well as legitimate scholarship. The latest flap involves retired newspaper editor and civil-rights crusader John Seigenthaler Sr., the subject of an anonymously written defamatory entry that lived on Wikipedia for six months earlier this year. Wales added paper-thin safeguards in response.

They're not enough to resolve Wikipedia's fundamental dilemma: It can't meet what Wales calls the project's primary goal -- producing ``a free, high-quality encyclopedia'' -- while also clinging to the utopian concept that anyone can contribute without restrictions.

How this crisis plays out will reverberate across the emerging landscape of ``social media,'' where loose groups -- such as Wikipedia's volunteer contributors -- come together through the Web to create news, community forums and information.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/13382496.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Melodramatic much?
John Seigenthaler could have fixed his entry himself.

The reason it wasn't fixed sooner is that it wasn't visited that much.

Entries visited more often get fixed sooner.

Wikipedia shouldn't completely change its model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it was incorrect for six months...
then that means someone KNEW it was incorrect for six months. Why not fix it. Anyone can.

Wikipedia is a great resource as long as you understand that everything you read there was written by visitors like you and me. I usually get info from Wikipedia, and if I need to cite it, I back it up with data from elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. exactly
it's all how it is used, that's where the focus should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe the "crisis" isn't monumental in proportion...
Wikipedia tells users that all entries are monitored and edited if necessary. It's not as if it's THE place to go to defame someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC