|
http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=2810D749-FB8B-4470-BC46-19D291CB008C:puke: Republicans and Democrats can't go on debating Iraq policy as though it were an election campaign. There's truth to be found on both sides.
Published on 12/8/2005
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman has aroused the ire of the more passionate partisans in his own party by supporting the Bush administration's view that U.S. policy in Iraq is making progress and dismissing calls from within the party for the withdrawal of American troops.
It is as though these Democrats, who chafed at suggestions from Republicans that Congressman John Murtha was disloyal for calling for an immediate U.S. withdrawal, were now saying that Sen. Lieberman is disloyal for suggesting otherwise.
There are, to be sure, questions about the picture the senator painted in an op-ed article in The Wall Street Journal, just as there are questions about the rosy scenario the Bush administration has been portraying against the backdrop of rising violence and fatalities.
But Sen. Lieberman has, in fact, visited Iraq four times in the last 17 months, and based on this, he is qualified to express his view, which is that the U.S. is making progress, even though it contradicts the political orthodoxy in his party. It also is not unreasonable for him to suggest that it would be unwise to follow Congressman Murtha's advice. Not only is this consistent with Sen. Lieberman's long-held convictions about the value of America's intervention; it also is a view shared by many reasonable Democrats, including Sen. Joseph Biden, the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Sen. Hillary Clinton. <SNIP>
|