Democracy under threat (Venezuela)

[bemildred]

he people of Venezuela have gone to the polls 11 times in seven years. Almost a superfluity of democracy, some might think, and signs of electoral fatigue could be detected in Sunday's elections for the National Assembly when only 30% of the electorate bothered to vote. The rest perceived the result as a foregone conclusion since in earlier elections President Hugo Chávez, or the candidates he backed, had stacked up substantial majorities. Sunday's poll followed the trend, and the Chávez list wiped the board.

---

Their action irritated the mission sent by the OAS which believed it had negotiated a settlement over opposition complaints about the new automated voting system. The opposition then turned turtle and announced its withdrawal. It was not acting alone. In the background, at private meetings on the island of Aruba in the Dutch Antilles and in public declarations by Thomas Shannon, the US secretary of state for Latin American affairs, the opposition had been elaborating a strategy to overthrow Chávez. Its plan was to make people believe that "democracy in Venezuela is in grave peril", as Shannon put it to a Washington subcommittee two weeks ago.

---

The US-backed strategy is to use apparently neutral non-governmental organisations to tell the world that the elections are not free and fair, that press freedom is under threat, and that human rights are not respected. These allegations are then exaggerated and amplified in Washington.

The complaints are nonsense. The opposition still owns most of the newspapers and television stations. The judiciary has been comprehensively reformed after the scandals of the previous decade when half the judges were found to be corrupt or incompetent. Elections have been endlessly vetted and human rights have been extended to the great mass of the people.

Guardian

[orwell]

1. The Real Question

Why is Venezuela's internal political affairs ours or anyone else's business. It is the Venezuelan people that must determine their own political institutions and form of government.

[NI4NI]

2. International Republican Institute

whose chairman is John McCain, has funded quite a few of the opposing parties who had boycotted this election even after the OAS, and the Jimmy Carter group investigations have not found any signs of election fraud now and in the past. Both watchdog groups have claimed that any request that the opposistion parties made were agreed to, including a paper trail for each vote.
The IRI is funded with American tax dollars.