Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dana Milbank On Cheney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:10 PM
Original message
Dana Milbank On Cheney
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/21/AR2005112101375.html

Opening the Door to Debate, and Then Shutting It

By Dana Milbank

Tuesday, November 22, 2005; Page A04

Vice President Cheney protested yesterday that he had been misunderstood when he said last week that critics of the White House over Iraq were "dishonest and reprehensible."

What he meant to say, he explained to his former colleagues at the American Enterprise Institute, was that those who question the White House's use of prewar intelligence were not only "dishonest and reprehensible" but also "corrupt and shameless."

It was about as close as the vice president gets to a retraction.
************

Cheney tried to follow his boss's edict. "I do not believe it is wrong to criticize the war on terror or any aspect thereof," he said.

But exactly three minutes later, the vice president added this caveat: "What is not legitimate, and what I will again say is dishonest and reprehensible, is the suggestion by some U.S. senators that the president . . . misled the American people on prewar intelligence." This, he said, "is revisionism of the most corrupt and shameless variety."

He floated the notion that "one might also argue that untruthful charges against the commander in chief have an insidious effect on the war effort itself" -- before adding: "I'm unwilling to say that."

It was a delicate act: Celebrating debate and criticism while declaring that a key element of that debate -- whether the administration exaggerated prewar intelligence about Iraq -- is off-limits. But Cheney achieved it with matter-of-fact indignation.

******************
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. What an asshole....
I sure hope when all of this is said and done he is left with nothing...absolutely nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Find out what motivates the man and you'll find out why the country
is so f**ked ritht now. Bastids all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. the talking point is getting real old and tiring!
Cheney tried to follow his boss's edict. "I do not believe it is wrong to criticize the war on terror or any aspect thereof," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's the funniest thing I've read all week:
"It was a delicate act"....But Cheney etc etc.

Asking Cheney to be DELICATE is like asking a bull in a china shop to be careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's enough to make your eyes glaze over, innit
When you can, without trying very hard, replay his words for him to prove that the Bush admin did just that. And still he would lie like a rug.

Damn. How do you deal with that many kinds of crazy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Inland:
Please be aware that DU copyright rules require that excerpts of copyrighted material be limited to four paragraphs and must include a link to the original source.

In the future, please adhere to DU copyright rules.

TIA,

unhappycamper
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, Old Man Potter, if it quacks like a duck,
walks like a duck and looks like a duck, don't call it a rose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nuthin' 'delicate' about cheney..his displays are hatefull&cruel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC