Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Libby Fell on His Sword

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 09:54 AM
Original message
Why Libby Fell on His Sword
interesting...

http://villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/archive/002021.php

Morning Report 11/4/05
Why Libby Fell On His Sword
Demo aide's theory: Scooter lied to delay Fitzgerald probe, saving 2004 election for Bush

Ward Harkavy

The press may have gotten played by the Bush regime to an even greater extent than we thought.

A theory advanced by Dennis Kelleher, a top aide to Maryland Democratic senator Barbara Mikulski, focuses on the question of Scooter Libby's motives for his alleged lies to prosecutor Pat Fitzgerald.

While we're waiting for Karl Rove to fall, Kelleher zooms in on the reason Libby told Fitzgerald that it was reporters who revealed Valerie Plame's identity and job to him.

Basically, this theory argues that Libby knowingly fell on his sword, thus throwing Fitzgerald off the track and in pursuit of the reporters, so that any Plamegate indictments would be delayed until after the November 2004 election, thus ensuring that Dick Cheney could continue as U.S. CEO.

continued
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Eh, could be. Could also just be hubris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. In Libby's world, falling on swords is probably a bizarre sex act
Along with little girls in cages with bears :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think he was also physically threatened...
"this time, it's your leg that's broken..." You know, like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't put anything past this administration
and at the same time wonder if they are this smart
in an evil way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. nah, the little bastard is just a liar
count on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. I believe Libby actually fell on a butter knife,
he knows Cheney will instruct Bush to grant him a pardon if Fitzgerald gets to close to indicting Cheney, or before the end of the Bush occupation of the White House in 2008 at the latest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldCurmudgeon Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. just a liar, counted on a whitewash
The problem with the "fall on his sword" theories is that Libby started his lying long before it was clear that there would even *be* a serious independent investigation, let alone indictments. That, and
"falling on his sword" would mean taking full responsibility to protect others, which Libby hasn't done.

No, it was just shortsighted butt-covering, and counting on the usual obstruction by Bush, congress, etc. to prevent any real investigation.

So now Libby is screwed, and it's very unlikely that he'd see a pardon before late 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm wondering.
Let's say the boy king pardons Libby. When we retake the White House in '08, can the Democratic President revoke the pardon, or find a way to make sure the traitors are jailed or punished?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC