WASHINGTON — Even before Vice President Cheney’s chief aide, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, was indicted, Republican leaders began to argue that being charged with perjury was a no big deal, but rather a “technicality” that proved that Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald hadn’t found evidence of a serious crime. But that isn’t what they were saying in the 1990s when the accused was Democratic Pres. Bill Clinton.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-TN, called perjury and obstruction of justice — both alleged in the Libby indictment — “public crimes threatening the administration of justice." House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-IL, described Clinton’s lies about sex as a serious enough violation of public trust to warrant impeachment.
Calling on Clinton to resign, Former House Majority Leader Rep. Tom DeLay, R-TX, now under indictment himself for money laundering, told the Los Angeles Times that his reason was “based solely on the fact that the president lied," while Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-UT, called lying under oath “very serious indeed.” Sen. Arlen Specter, R-PA, said "perjury and obstruction of justice are serious offenses which must not be tolerated by anyone in our society." <snip>
Conservative TV personalities eager to diminish the importance of the charges against Libby were equally convinced that similar charges against Clinton called for his removal from office. "Certainly, perjury is a felony, the last time I checked," said Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly called it “abuse of power.” Describing perjury as “pretty important,” CNN’s Ann Coulter noted that, along with making false statements and objecting justice, it had made Clinton’s misdeeds a “much bigger deal."
http://www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/112005/1102.shtml