Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP's comical defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 09:48 AM
Original message
GOP's comical defense
http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051025/EDIT/510250323/1003

By Jonathan Chait

I've been waiting for quite a while now for conservatives to come up with a theory to explain why large chunks of the Republican Party are, or soon will be, under indictment. The argument I've been anticipating has finally arrived, in the form of a long lead editorial in the latest edition of the influential conservative magazine the Weekly Standard.

The editorial, written by Standard Editor William Kristol and longtime conservative activist Jeffrey Bell, begins by acknowledging the uncomfortable fact that "the most prominent promoters of the conservative agenda of the Bush administration" are facing legal troubles of one kind or another. It cites the legal imbroglios of Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, Tom DeLay and Bill Frist. It neglects to mention David Safavian, the chief of staff at the General Services Administration in the Bush administration; conservative activist/super-lobbyists Jack Abramoff and Michael Scanlon; and Reps. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R- Calif., and Robert W. Ney, R-Ohio, and perhaps some others I'm forgetting.

Anyway, one conclusion you could draw from all these examples is that the Republican Party has gotten a bit corrupt. The Standard does not, however, draw this conclusion. Another possibility is that it's all just a coincidence. The Standard doesn't conclude that, either. Instead, the editorial declares, "a comprehensive strategy of criminalization had been implemented to inflict defeat on conservatives who seek to govern as conservatives."

The wording here is instructive. The authors have obviously chosen to use the passive voice to avoid having to spell out just who has implemented this comprehensive strategy of criminalization. That's because answering that question would expose just how silly their theory is...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. When their leading strategists are spewing such transparent goofiness,
it's a sign they are so frozen with terror they can no longer think straight. It's beginning to look a lot like Fitzmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll throw something out for the conspiracy buffs......

Why are Repugs all over the country having legal problems?

Hey, Goopers...... Don't fu*k with The Company. Bad things happen to those who fu*k with The Company, man. Bad things!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You got that right!
I have been pondering that issue for some time now. Did you know that about a 5-minute drive from Langley (the amazingly ironically named "George Bush Center For Intelligence" :rofl:) there is a scenic overlook of the Potomac, with a beautiful view of the Naval Observatory (Veep's residence)?

You just have to be really insane to screw with the Company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love Chait's mockery of Kristol's use of the passive voice.
"a comprehensive strategy of criminalization had been implemented to inflict defeat on conservatives who seek to govern as conservatives."

Chait says,

"I don't want to say they've abandoned their principles en masse when they've become inconvenient. I'll just suggest that a comprehensive strategy of principle abandonment has been implemented."


Hahahaha! The ole rule of law thing. They're going to be hoist by their own petard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC